[推倒重來??] 直通車翻新再次邀請資格預審
上年:http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=907997&extra=
http://www.mtr.com.hk/en/corporate/tenders/K0385-15E.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20150 ... ders/K0385-15E.html
今日再黎多次, 不過多咗D 嘢 (斜體字):
http://www.mtr.com.hk/en/corporate/tenders/K0385-16E.html
The scope of the Works shall cover the refurbishment of the twelve double-deck Ktt train cars including interior finishes, pantry, seating, wall, ceiling panels and catering equipment, passenger information display system, lighting, fire alarm system etc. and rectification of defects during the Defects Liability Period for the refurbished Ktt Train.Interior layout drawings showing the design intent and a tentative list of materials will be provided by the Corporation while the final design shall be carried out by the Contractor.
係咪上次無公司肯入標? 又或者全部都過唔到預審? 乜KTT好舊咩?K-train(TKL)好明顯更有需要:curse:
宜家M記好似仇視前K公司車咁,KTT要翻新,MLR退得仲快過M-train:Q(MLR睇落好過M-train先吖)
唔係仲玩岐視要變晒有M記風嘅車先安落嘛;P
E3Tsubasa 發表於 2016-6-24 20:05
乜KTT好舊咩?K-train(TKL)好明顯更有需要
宜家M記好似仇視前K公司車咁,KTT要翻新,MLR退得仲快過M-tr ...
1998 vs 2002
30 yr vs 40 yr
E3Tsubasa 發表於 2016-6-24 20:05
乜KTT好舊咩?K-train(TKL)好明顯更有需要
宜家M記好似仇視前K公司車咁,KTT要翻新,MLR退得仲快過M-tr ...
先唔好講港鐵係咪真係仇視九鐵嘅一切。無論一條鐵路係由邊間機構營運,車廂要翻新/退役,公司理應對其作出左評估。
KTT客車已經服務左18年,作中期翻新其實係好正常嘅決定。
至於MLR同M-Train,之前網上資料同好多師兄已經講過,前者設計上本身只有30年壽命(M-Train為40年),行到2019年已經係極限中嘅極限。
大家諗下,三門改五門,新聞直線,ATO,呢三樣嘢已經令本身唔係通勤設計嘅MLR帶黎大量嘅負擔。
至於「要變晒有M記風嘅車先安落嘛」,我個人又好同意呢句說話。
除左紅黑灰同白籠,就只有紅黑灰同白籠。可想而知,利用企業形象清洗前朝所建立嘅印象,係幾咁小器。
marcowong1011 發表於 2016-6-24 21:15
1998 vs 2002
30 yr vs 40 yr
不過K車內籠似乎仲殘過KTT,之前坐過KTT張絲絨櫈仲幾靚仔
雖然一款係客車一款係EMU:lol
唔知今次翻新會唔會改埋車外塗裝呢? Ramsey 發表於 2016-6-24 22:28
先唔好講港鐵係咪真係仇視九鐵嘅一切。無論一條鐵路係由邊間機構營運,車廂要翻新/退役,公司理應對其作 ...
係喎,唔記得MLR係做過大翻新同係近郊型:o不過KTT個內裝比大陸新客車(24T?)仲靚,改完會唔會仲衰;P退化
同埋有EAL快速(XRL)直通車應該會減班,可能剩返KTT運行列車la
Ktt 車廂唔算好殘,而且坐感仍然遠勝25T,若果龜仔預直通車唔會再被減速,翻新都有著數,不過都係果句,最重要係機車都應該趁高鐵通車後大執下
頁:
[1]
2