kei_hk 發表於 2018-9-13 09:46
根據法例﹐所有中型及重型貨車﹐巴士都有最車速限制﹐都係 70KM/H(或路面標示﹐以較低為準)。
根據法例
你估下一部出街行緊既巴士有邊部係真正合法
;P
GA6072 發表於 2018-9-13 22:59
根據法例
你估下一部出街行緊既巴士有邊部係真正合法
合唔合法﹐係睇司機﹐唔係睇車本身的。
法例無限車輛本身的最高車速﹐只有限制司機駕駛時的車速。
即係碌神上身就唔會有事。;P
kei_hk 發表於 2018-9-13 23:15
合唔合法﹐係睇司機﹐唔係睇車本身的。
法例無限車輛本身的最高車速﹐只有限制司機駕駛時的車速。
小弟就係講部車本身就好多地方唔合法
轉自阿爺FB
I really can’t believe what I’m reading here. KMB intends spending $200m on retrofitting 1,000 dd buses with seatbelts whilst at the same time requesting an 8.5% increase in fares. This is a massive overreaction.
First of all, these will be the first normal, city type operation buses in the world to be so fitted. Why is HK so unique ? Next,how will the wearing of seat belts be enforced on a 90 seat dd bus ? Then, what about standees on buses ?: will such passengers be chained to handpoles which, by the way, I notice are largely eliminated from KMB’s newest buses ? What about passengers leaving their seats to alightwhilst the bus is in motion ?
Bus operation is a high risk industry and accidents are inevitable for a multitude of unanticipated reasons. To suggest that ‘ We will not let similar accidents happen again’ is utterly naive. Whilst all responsible bus managers do all they can to prevent accidents, the unimaginable sometimes happens. I speak from experience having gone through it.
Regrettably, this is an unnecessary expense which other bus companies will be reluctantly forced to follow.
專家都話多餘
YoungMan 發表於 2018-9-13 23:24
轉自阿爺FB
I really can’t believe what I’m reading here. KMB intends spending $200m on retrofittin ...
差人做野洗唔洗你教
:lol:lol:lol
GA6072 發表於 2018-9-13 22:59
根據法例
你估下一部出街行緊既巴士有邊部係真正合法
專利巴士咪鎖晒70，專線小巴咪鎖晒80km/h囉
就連某間非專，旗下低地台巴士都鎖76km/h
HE7921 發表於 2018-9-14 06:05
專利巴士咪鎖晒70，專線小巴咪鎖晒80km/h囉
就連某間非專，旗下低地台巴士都鎖76km/h ...
唔係指極速
某間非專D車係合法,完全無問題
GA6072 發表於 2018-9-13 23:21
小弟就係講部車本身就好多地方唔合法
部車有邊方面唔合法?
區麗芝 發表於 2018-9-14 23:43
作為巴士乘客嘅各位，點解會反對/恥笑巴士上多一種保障乘客安全嘅設備?
該設備在沒被使用的情況下有增加風險的可能性