ryulky 發表於 2008-2-12 13:34

原帖由 DIH 於 2008-2-11 22:34 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
有一日我晚飯後在黃大仙見到一部ME沿龍翔道往觀塘方向行駛,不知是哪一部及甚麼事?
冇乜可能在該處見到架ME......

好明顯係有部私人擁有o既ME出黎遊車河la

ben2004 發表於 2008-2-12 13:48

原帖由 HS6573_MP3905 於 2008-2-12 13:31 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
其實我都有諗過買部AM.....:lol

要保留一部冷氣車絕對唔係咁簡單 ...

S3BL1 發表於 2008-2-12 19:58

現時購入一部退役巴士需多少錢呢?:)

AS

DIH 發表於 2008-2-12 22:58

原帖由 ryulky 於 2008-2-12 13:34 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif


好明顯係有部私人擁有o既ME出黎遊車河la
我當然知道這個:L,只係當日唔多覺有巴迷活動,前後也沒有其他退役巴士,
該處也不是這些退役巴士經常出現的地方,咁即係佢當私家車出去兜風咁啦,我明喇。

virus 發表於 2008-2-13 00:57

Transperth 發表於 2008-2-14 22:20

原帖由 DD2113 於 2008-2-11 20:23 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif

最大單, 最嚴重的應該是A會曾暫存於九鐵洪水橋車場的前九巴 Damiler A (4964),
當年... 好像是96-97年, 為何它會起火.... 燒到差不多得番個框?

據聞係有人故意縱火…:L

art0925 發表於 2008-2-24 06:10

Are these ppl just mentally ill or something, why should someone decided to do such a damage to once private property, too bad HK doen't have the mindset of preservation of historical artifacts.in US (WA for example) if that artifact was deemd historical. And someone decided to damage it intentionally, not only will be liable for criminal charges on damage once property, but also he will be liable for damaging historical value artifacts, which carry a greater penalty then just damaging once's property.
頁: 1 2 [3]
查看完整版本: 10/2東方日報:購退役巴士 狂迷有個夢