http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7274544.stm
from this news, London mayoral candidate, Mr Johnson, wants to introduce a new version of the double-decker bus "that will once again give London ...
幾個月前同一份報紙賣過了...
話咩正在研究緊新的routemaster,
又有張草圖介紹架車
我剪低左諗住上來分享下,不過整理家企時可能錯手掉左 :'(
架車一樣係後面上落,不過如果有輪椅人士上車的話,
車身前面(即前軸後面)可以打開比佢上,應該好似coach果d今樣,
下層係唔係低地台好似冇講,而且車頭好似舊rm今樣,不過就[時代化]左好多....
即本睇下佢幾時出得街....:lol 原帖由 wrightap 於 2008-3-18 09:22 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
E..老友...你張相係唔係坐緊４５３批新掛接影的？lol
你睇唔睇到佢點解話唔再入掛接？:Q
今日行過都冇拎份報紙．．:L
睇來分分鐘４５３批掛接變成左最後的掛接．．．:L
掛接其實幾好啊，上落客又快，又可以〔偷雞:lol 〕．．
不過相信唔少ｌｏｎｄｏｎ市中心 ...
唔係. 我影個陣係坐緊Underground Piccadilly line, 見到成車都係newspaper, 便拿份來看, 點知一看就見到呢段野. 原帖由 wrightap 於 2008-3-18 18:46 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
幾個月前同一份報紙賣過了...
話咩正在研究緊新的routemaster,
又有張草圖介紹架車
我剪低左諗住上來分享下,不過整理家企時可能錯手掉左 :'(
架車一樣係後面上落,不過如果有輪椅人士上車的話,
車身前面(即前軸後面 ...
係之前兩期BUSES 都有講過 原帖由 S3BL343@66 於 2008-3-18 17:55 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
可以同鑯巴，嶼巴溝通下:lol
香港未使要到... 又唔係行唔到雙層巴士 :P
一係問o下澳門d巴士公司 :lol ............ 原帖由 lcl 於 2008-3-18 23:31 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
香港未使要到... 又唔係行唔到雙層巴士 :P
一係問o下澳門d巴士公司 :lol ............
行西隧線慳隧道費都夠:victory:
.....城巴買呢同非專利部換車行88R,
倫敦寶>1XX>倫敦掛接:P
[ 本帖最後由 89B 於 2008-3-19 00:41 編輯 ] 如果我係London中層人仕，見到Johnson 0既言論，真係唔知好嬲定好笑
原來一個咁現代化0既都市要有conductor先可以保住有錢收
大陸都開始唔用conductor啦，咁即係話London 0既市民係賊...
回復 3# 的帖子
要上落快, 不如學歐洲其他城市咁用三門巴士啦, 12米, 靈活D~架新ROUTEMASTER不倫不類...況且ROUTEMASTER出名嘅唔止係個CONDUCTOR, 仲有佢夠耐用, 維修簡單, 唔係由電腦話事 原帖由 nwfb23 於 2008-3-19 00:54 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
如果我係London中層人仕，見到Johnson 0既言論，真係唔知好嬲定好笑
原來一個咁現代化0既都市要有conductor先可以保住有錢收
大陸都開始唔用conductor啦，咁即係話London 0既市民係賊... ...
只係視乎逃票帶黎少收既前多定請CONDUCTOR既人工貴遮,
以乘客角度,
有CONDUCTOR比冇好,
唔駛上車買定飛,坐定定慢慢揾錢就得,
司機又可以專心開車,
問路就問CONDUCTOR.
好似深圳巴士咁,
有時賣飛姐姐都會幫埋司機睇位CUT線有冇車,
增加行車安全,幾好. 倫敦市竟然話唔行Bendy,真係唔知當初諗行Zone個班行好嬲定好笑
如果香港平平地執番架玩下都好,起碼新大嶼山同龍運多幾架好使好用
Bendy用,不過而家入口車要歐四/歐五,除非囉架大水煲(Fuel Cell)Citaro
或者有機會,否則繼續買陳生o的車過手癮,唔知囉去澳門又得唔得?坐Benz
發財車去發財真係威到盡:D 原帖由 nwfb23 於 2008-3-19 00:54 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
如果我係London中層人仕，見到Johnson 0既言論，真係唔知好嬲定好笑
原來一個咁現代化0既都市要有conductor先可以保住有錢收
大陸都開始唔用conductor啦，咁即係話London 0既市民係賊... ...
To me, the speech from the Conservative candidate was rather politcal.The promise of keeping the conductors back on buses would mean a large labour power need, hints higher employment rate. Johnson's speech is shadowing the Labour party's path of which they are making an attempt to attract the blue collar classes' votes.
原帖由 orange 於 2008-3-19 02:32 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
倫敦市竟然話唔行Bendy,真係唔知當初諗行Zone個班行好嬲定好笑
如果香港平平地執番架玩下都好,起碼新大嶼山同龍運多幾架好使好用
Bendy用,不過而家入口車要歐四/歐五,除非囉架大水煲(Fuel Cell)Citaro
或者有機會, ...
As I said earlier in 2005, the withdrawl of the RM was rather a political move towards the EU H&S Regulation rather than an improvement from TfL.I did not see a need of bendy buses on London's truck routes.It just happened at the right time, with the bus "operators" in London were trying to cut cost at the time, but with the wrong choice of buses. "P
In HK, routes like XHT 301, LWB S1 or NLB 38 would find a good use of the bendys. Similar usages are found with the Gold Arrow routes in Central London. But for Macau, I doubt if the "visitors" from HK would like to stand all the way from the jet foil ferry to the casino, as it would means bad luck to them, haha.