加 四 車
當初..真係有需要轉細車？....http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v420/6520/212.png
本相片於中午時份拍攝
[ 本帖最後由 2304 於 2008-4-2 18:02 編輯 ] :D一時四十二分只有上午或下午，「中午」呢個詞通常用黎形容正午左
右之時間，若列明時間的話，中午只係講十二點正那一刻。 原帖由 HY671 於 2008-4-2 17:58 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
:D一時四十二分只有上午或下午，「中午」呢個詞通常用黎形容正午左
右之時間，若列明時間的話，中午只係講十二點正那一刻。
係喎....頭先心急打錯左.. :hug: 72 L廠果邊轉ADS後, 唔知原來的掛牌車長有冇因車型津貼被減
而離開72??印象中L廠有日薪掛牌車長 原帖由 葵盛東居民AMN36 於 2008-4-2 18:46 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
72 L廠果邊轉ADS後, 唔知原來的掛牌車長有冇因車型津貼被減
而離開72??印象中L廠有日薪掛牌車長
除左替字軌之外,全部都係日薪車長
轉掛牌初期有個長師傅早申請甩牌,但因為貪72"好做",最終放棄甩牌.. 睇張相,差不多坐滿,今日的72不像10年前 原帖由 petcity 於 2008-4-3 22:21 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
但可以同你講，朝早繁忙時間，呢班車由中大到禾輋呢段路
見都係頂多坐滿窻口位，今個月正好後車係躉，同樣架車唔
見得話好爆
Is it necessary to pack the bus and have people couldnt get on before you put a larger bus for service?
i understand bus company needs to find a way to cut cost.
but i dont think putting smaller buses on 72 is a good move.
(70/72A/73A/74A definitely should have smaller buses!)
they do save some labor money, but
having smaller buses shouldnt yield too much fuel economy (ADS vs 3AV)
but they are running a risk of missing some passengers
I have been on 72 with full loads (mornings & evenings) 原帖由 petcity 於 2008-4-3 22:21 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
但可以同你講，朝早繁忙時間，呢班車由中大到禾輋呢段路
見都係頂多坐滿窻口位，今個月正好後車係躉，同樣架車唔
見得話好爆
星期日中午十二點幾o係沙田見到HA7489 @ 72 近乎頂閘
跟住隔左大概2, 3個字後車ADS 到但唔見得好多人
似乎前車食左好多客.... 原帖由 dicksonboy 於 2008-4-4 00:27 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Is it necessary to pack the bus and have people couldnt get on before you put a larger bus for service?
i understand bus company needs to find a way to cut cost.
but i dont think putting smaller bus ...
右右,呢單野又係那些政府工程師諗出來既
"好事",唔係你朋友因為要減成本而搞出來既事
不過最唔明用安全帶車荔廠搞上水廠就唔搞,
但最爆個幾班車就係荔廠車時段,真係R頭
頁:
[1]
2