小角色
發表於 2009-8-4 20:48
原帖由 海怡工貿 於 4-8-2009 09:49 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
因為富豪廠方已經轉用左B9TL取代超豪.
而且超豪同B9TL底盤都有明顯分別, 就係B9TL右邊車身樓梯下面已經無左個散熱水箱.
之但係B9前部份係同B10差唔多一樣啵..而散熱水箱設計既位都仲
係到啵~~
KT6487
發表於 2009-8-4 21:23
原帖由 小角色 於 2009-8-4 20:48 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
之但係B9前部份係同B10差唔多一樣啵..而散熱水箱設計既位都仲
係到啵~~
之前好似有人話B9 係B7TL 演變出黎的...
NV58
發表於 2009-8-5 04:40
原帖由 kei_hk 於 2009-8-4 03:19 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
相反﹐v 記研發時出問題﹐最初是當直接推出 B9﹐但是始終都是不成功。眼見對方已經成功出車供貨﹐自己的研發尚未成功。於是﹐hold 起B9的研發﹐把舊有的奧林比安車陣改做﹐把車頭部份轉成超低地台﹐水箱搬去司機位後﹐而後半部仍舊用原設計﹐用 B10 作為車型/車款/設計代號。
This statement alone is sufficient to squash this rumour.
Volvo initially came up with a low floor double decker at the beginning, which is the B7TL, but the engine was deemed insufficient to power the type built to the HK-specification i.e. 12m air-conditioned. Instead of developing a brand new product line, the decision was to mate the B7L front to the Olympian's rear module, which becomes the Super Olympian (B10TL). To that end, the B10TL is indeed a stopgap because Volvo didn't really plan to keep the D10A engine going (which was to be replaced by the D7 and D12 engines) beyond Euro 2, but at the end they did of course.
These all happened in late 1990s and the B9TL did not even come into the equation until much later i.e. 2004/5. The B9TL is essentially a B7TL with the D9A/B engine, plus new front suspensions and it finally rationalise Volvo's 2 and 3-axle double decker product lines by replacing both the B7TL and B10TL.
[ 本帖最後由 NV58 於 2009-8-4 20:41 編輯 ]
cn2661_2d32
發表於 2009-8-6 11:33
Engine的問題,我也聽聞volvo自家engine唔夠力應付香港需要
所以買左法國Renault的設計用來做B9副Engine
有冇人可証實?
*係唔係過渡好難講,不過上一代同下一代的產物唔多唔少都有關係.
亦都可以話,B10TL系B10T的低地台版,並唔係全新產品.咁合理d
唔通Dart 同Dart SLF的關係,dart slf係過渡產品咩
只可以話B10T -> B10TL呢個轉變求其左少少.
由車中間的H形陣架到引擎室同B10T冇乜變過.
但減低維修成本係巴士公司一個優點
kmb_gu657
發表於 2009-8-6 11:54
原帖由 cn2661_2d32 於 2009-8-6 11:33 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Engine的問題,我也聽聞volvo自家engine唔夠力應付香港需要
所以買左法國Renault的設計用來做B9副Engine
有冇人可証實?
*係唔係過渡好難講,不過上一代同下一代的產物唔多唔少都有關係.
亦都可以話,B10TL系B10T的低地台版,並唔係全新產品.咁合理d
...
What is B10T? Volvo never produced anything called the B10T
3ASV467
發表於 2009-8-6 12:07
原帖由 kmb_gu657 於 2009-8-6 11:54 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
What is B10T? Volvo never produced anything called the B10T
唔肯定呢隻係咪
http://nat.tmv.gov.tw/carspec/VOLVO/VOLVO-B10T-2.jpg
a396
發表於 2009-8-6 13:31
原帖由 cn2661_2d32 於 2009-8-6 11:33 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Engine的問題,我也聽聞volvo自家engine唔夠力應付香港需要
所以買左法國Renault的設計用來做B9副Engine
有冇人可証實?
你講o既連某期 BUSES 雜誌都報導過.
係喎, B9TL 出o左大概一年, 曾經o係富豪
巴士官方網頁以 'Olympian' 為名, 不過我
最近一次上去睇, 'Olympian' 呢個名就唔
再出現.
kmb_gu657
發表於 2009-8-6 13:34
原帖由 3ASV467 於 2009-8-6 12:07 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
唔肯定呢隻係咪
http://nat.tmv.gov.tw/carspec/VOLVO/VOLVO-B10T-2.jpg
I might get it wrong, but this one should be a 3-axle version of the B10M,
and Volvo never called the Olympian as B10T.
[ 本帖最後由 kmb_gu657 於 2009-8-6 13:35 編輯 ]
3ASV467
發表於 2009-8-6 14:29
出錯:L多謝指正
[ 本帖最後由 3ASV467 於 2009-8-6 20:29 編輯 ]
ads190
發表於 2009-8-6 14:56
原帖由 3ASV467 於 2009-8-6 14:29 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Olympian應該係叫B10L
B10L係低地台兼且副偈係打直擺o係車尾左手邊,
同Olympian係兩隻完全唔同o既o野。