3asv6 發表於 2009-12-6 22:26

前跨夠位裝門...

但度門0係中間...

abh 發表於 2009-12-7 07:13

進化論

佢買呢架車之前既車, 如非特別改造, 前跨不夠放門.
佢買呢架車之後既車, 如非前跨不夠, 前跨都已放門.

blueblue 發表於 2009-12-7 10:53

原帖由 abh 於 2009-12-7 07:13 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
進化論

佢買呢架車之前既車, 如非特別改造, 前跨不夠放門.
佢買呢架車之後既車, 如非前跨不夠, 前跨都已放門.

好深奧...
呢架係唔係前機車?所以放唔落度門?

hkptb 發表於 2009-12-7 13:57

呢架是傷建人仕車輛
車門放置中間是放便乘搭者更方便直上直落
我估對門亦包含升降台,位置所限車門才放置中間

abh 發表於 2009-12-7 20:36

原帖由 hkptb 於 2009-12-7 13:57 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
呢架是傷建人仕車輛
車門放置中間是放便乘搭者更方便直上直落
我估對門亦包含升降台,位置所限車門才放置中間

I don't think wheelchair lift can be fitted to a door with this width. WIdth of this door is the same as ordinary LT133s.

abh 發表於 2009-12-7 20:43

原帖由 blueblue 於 2009-12-7 10:53 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif


好深奧...
呢架係唔係前機車?所以放唔落度門?

LT133L.

Explanation:
佢買呢架車之前既車, 如非特別改造, 前跨不夠放門.

First statement:
I cannot think of a bus with long front overhang to accommodate door before this bus was introduced. e.g FSR / FRR

Second Statement:
佢買呢架車之後既車, 如非前跨不夠, 前跨都已放門.

To my understanding, all newer buses with front overhang long enough to accommodate entrance door have fitted entrance door in front.
e.g. LT134
But for buses with front overhang insufficient for installing entrance door, the entrance doors are still fitted behind front axle.
e.g. Coaster

I hope this can give you a clearer view.

[ 本帖最後由 abh 於 2009-12-7 20:44 編輯 ]
頁: [1]
查看完整版本: 前跨夠位裝門...