上層側窗好似高身過香港果D(定冷氣槽反光令到空間感大左?)
唔係好明下層地台點解唔斜住上走去整級
原帖由 on11358 於 2010-10-5 20:04 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
載客為
上層:55(九巴:53)
下層:27(九巴:27)
企位:49(九巴:46)
總數:131(九巴:126)
比九巴直梯版多5個位。
值得留意係右面車頭組件刻意偷左少少位，彌補前排腳位空間過窄，
唔知係果邊要求定係車廠設計一部份。 ...
比起九巴,sbs設計可說實而不華
下層佈局實用左
幾適合行市區線
樓下冷氣槽走位都唔同左
如果城巴都買呢d車行5系就好啦
比起3xx
黎部81xx車尾好難出入上落呢
[ 本帖最後由 ksmbh 於 2010-10-5 22:58 編輯 ]
原帖由 samsam554312 於 2010-10-5 14:22 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
上層側窗好似高身過香港果D(定冷氣槽反光令到空間感大左?)
唔係好明下層地台點解唔斜住上走去整級
I think the colour has a bit of an effect, and so is the fact that the seats haven't got headrests, which let a bit more light inside the bus.
As for the floor at the back, without that step, the step onto the seats just behind the rear door will be unacceptably high.
原帖由 NV58 於 2010-10-8 03:38 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
I think the colour has a bit of an effect, and so is the fact that the seats haven't got headrests, which let a bit more light inside the bus.
As for the floor at the back, without that step, the s ...
The reason probably because of the fuel tank, it has fuel filler and adblue filler on both side
same as other SBS double deckers.
Also it is not a straight staircase low floor..
原帖由 sutrak 於 2010-10-5 18:17 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
唔知今次用邊款冷氣呢? 見樓上車尾高o左一級, 會唔會係因為部冷氣大o左 (唔係用 Denso), 定係因為就番樓下車尾條冷氣槽先升高樓上呢?
我覺得如果香港 d 雙層冷氣巴上層尾排可以加返 1 級 ge 話會好 d
始終果排比其他 ge 位高 d, 好多人坐果排位都 "吊腳"
今日出牌B9
SBS7503X (YV3S4P928AA141633)
SBS7505R (YV3S4P923AA141474)
[ 本帖最後由 GK9636 於 2010-10-13 14:28 編輯 ]
原帖由 GK9636 於 2010-10-13 14:26 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
今日出牌B9
SBS7503X (YV3S4P928AA141633)
SBS7505R (YV3S4P923AA141474)
據講今次好多4字尾車牌唔會用
7500D 7503X 7505R 派去东区域
7501B 7502Z 派去西区域
今日出牌B9
SBS7506M YV3S4P92XAA141634
SBS7507K YV3S4P925AA141475
Still, none of these buses in service yet