原帖由 kp3011 於 2011-11-8 12:40 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
首先，佢需要證明到係因為有區會大帝阻止 66 全冷，然後再需要證明九巴在此時機將 66 全冷是因為需要逃避「區會大帝」，否則該站友的指控純屬虛構，對各相關區議會及九巴構成不實指控 ...
有幾不實？
閣下可以翻查過往區議會紀錄
好多項全冷建議都遭到區議會否決噃
而且評論新聞，何來指控？閣下係咪過份神經緊張？
原帖由 dippy 於 2011-11-8 13:17 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
As the A/C of some route has been banned by the district concil (says 71S/72)
It is quite obvious that the A/C of route bay be banned by other district.
KMB therefore retire the non-A/C busses between sept to nov this year during the election period if the district concil
As seen from the retirement of the non-A/C busses and the case of 71S. It is quite tribute that the airconditioning of routes is not welcomed by the district conciller.
It only showed air-conditionization of these routes was banned, and KMB withdrew non-A/C buses during the election period of the district council, which should be treated as two unrelated issues. There is lack of evidences showing the obvious causality between these two issues. I wont say that someone linking these two issues together as a risk of defamation, but it is doubtless that something is missing in linking these two issues together, which those proposing and supporting this opinion failed, or ever didnt ever attempt to provide. :(
[ 本帖最後由 teddybus 於 2011-11-8 16:42 編輯 ]
你又唔係區議會既人,又唔係話你,咁緊張做乜?
就算要告誹謗,都係區議會D人告佢啦,關你咩事先?
原帖由 sea1986 於 2011-11-8 15:12 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
有幾不實？
閣下可以翻查過往區議會紀錄
好多項全冷建議都遭到區議會否決噃
而且評論新聞，何來指控？閣下係咪過份神經緊張？
http://forum5.hkitalk.net/view.aspx?message=3366169
簡單拎一個例子：「日本電視主播吃福島蔬菜後患急性白血病」
A ： 「日本電視主播吃福島蔬菜」
B ： 「該主播患急性白血病」
係咪就等於「因為 A 所以 B 」先？
都唔好計你響後面再加一個假定：
A：「區議會通常反對全冷」
B：「九巴 66 於 11 月 7 日全冷」
C：「九巴覺得 A 係一件麻煩事」
之後無端端出一個結論係「九巴見得 A 多，加上有 C 諗法，所以 B」，咁樣連「區議會反對 66 全冷」呢個論述都無出現到，唔係老屈係乜野呢？
[ 本帖最後由 kp3011 於 2011-11-8 18:33 編輯 ]
本文鎖上調查, 即時起禁止修改.
admin26
就本文收到數個報告, 本人進行了較詳細之考慮.
現決定是本文未有人違反站規, 本文重開.
在此重申, 本人希望盡量保持本版之言論自由,
亦希望站友表達意見時能合乎站規要求, 有一
定理據
就本次事件, 本人不就有關情況定奪誰是正確,
本人亦明白不同站友之意見也可能不同, 唯希望
站友討論時保持禮貌, 尊重
本人將會加強留意本文
admin26
其實如東方日報所說， 九巴剩餘熱狗不足八十部，
最後日子可能真係條線因為機件問題出唔到熱狗，
九巴可唔可以以冷代熱， 嗰個字軌收返熱狗價就算數？
咁樣， 斷估唔會受到區議會質疑啩？
[ 本帖最後由 king 於 2011-11-12 15:07 編輯 ]
原帖由 king 於 2011-11-12 15:06 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
其實如東方日報所說， 九巴剩餘熱狗不足八十部，
最後日子可能真係條線因為機件問題出唔到熱狗，
九巴可唔可以以冷代熱， 嗰個字軌收返熱狗價就算數？
咁樣， 斷估唔會受到區議會質疑啩？ ...
大把混合線日日冷代熱甚至長期全冷, 而家仲可以將個熱狗字軌收返
熱狗價? 簡直冇可能。