(我唔想提都唔得) 有人玩野新招
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1zVkX4xQJY&feature=youtube_gdata_player582 都投訴, 咁636-654係唔係應該投訴先呢? 其實我唔係好想關心佢D野
可唔可以del左個post佢;P
留返d正正常常既post係度得唔得.. 我唔見得九巴派車好得去邊,舊車係咪唔可以搭先?
但令我最費解係點解一定要比13.4搭690/692返藍田....:L
如果唔想坐咪搭601/619/671囉,實有新車架... 3AV/3AD的車齡與5XX/6XX差不多
我又應不應該投訴?
p.s 38,215X有好多3AV,某君理論上可以上去投訴 睇到佢寫呢句.....:L
Hence, I felt inconvenience boarding the bus. Moreover, the vibration was severe while being in motion, contributing deterrence to the quality of travel
[ 本帖最後由 LF5502 於 2013-10-14 01:46 編輯 ] 中伏片一條,唔好開
唔小心開左比lrt505 d尖叫聲嚇醒其他人,死白痴低能仔lrt505,整埋呢d低能片 原帖由 KG1428 於 2013-10-14 00:16 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
3AV/3AD的車齡與5XX/6XX差不多
我又應不應該投訴?
p.s 38,215X有好多3AV,某君理論上可以上去投訴 麥生曾經投訴3AD (8964) 為「野戰巴士」!:lol 咩叫唔想提都唔得? 呢D垃圾唔提點解唔得?
或者你係呢個post打埋條片係咩黎啦, 唔好浪費左大家幾秒...
回復 9# 的帖子
平時果位朋友只懂投訴老九, 如果今次係老九我就唔post啦..點知今次係"萬民愛戴"的城巴 :funk: