客量大減 巴士轉型服務點對點
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/finance/20131030/51858070您一時又話點對點，您又話路線重組。會唔會自相矛盾左D 原帖由 Crotone 於 2013-10-30 22:10 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
您一時又話點對點，您又話路線重組。會唔會自相矛盾左D
兩個項目沒有衝突，路線重組的結果可以是點對點路線
現在就是要透過路線重組放棄一些非點對點路線，尤其是長途流水，去換點對點特快線 宜家九記興點對點加接駁
即係點對點巴士到每區的大站(轉乘站),
小區居民就搭接駁車去轉乘站轉車
重組就係要做呢樣野, 所以係無衝突 近年香港塞車嚴重咗, 尤其非繁時都塞梗車, 巴士好蝕
雖然廿年前屯公塞車巴士排長龍, 但畢竟當時巴士幾乎滿載, 應該唔會蝕 原帖由 JF1261 於 2013-10-30 23:30 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
宜家九記興點對點加接駁
即係點對點巴士到每區的大站(轉乘站),
小區居民就搭接駁車去轉乘站轉車
重組就係要做呢樣野, 所以係無衝突
呢個當然係最理想 o既宏願,
就算係政府都想係咁,
問題係香港可以咩 ?
山頭主義呢家野, 又或者區議會呢個 system 已經注定一區一線, 小區駁大區呢家野唔 work,
個個人恨不得想條條線經佢屋企樓下 ~ 原帖由 AVD1 於 2013-10-31 07:54 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
呢個當然係最理想 o既宏願,
就算係政府都想係咁,
問題係香港可以咩 ?
山頭主義呢家野, 又或者區議會呢個 system 已經注定一區一線, 小區駁大區呢家野唔 work,
個個人恨不得想條條線經佢屋企樓下 ~ ...
you are right, someone always wants 238X to via tai wo hau, but in reality it seems that this will not happen
riviera garden have treated 238X as an exclusive residential bus service that only they could have.
Same with 219X.
Eh, I wish Laguna city could free their hands off from 219X and let it extend to lei yue man. Thus, the 14X mess would not be created. 原帖由 AD118 於 31/10/2013 08:16 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
you are right, someone always wants 238X to via tai wo hau, but in reality it seems that this will not happen
riviera garden have treated 238X as an exclusive residential bus service ...
改路都要諗下順唔順路架大佬，
楊屋道我都忍你，
如果出埋大窩口我不如搭 38A 出去轉
或者索性搭西鐵算數喇。
如果大窩口 + 楊屋道嘅客
大唔過 海濱 + 海灣 + 環宇 (+ 楊屋道)，
咁唔做真係商業決定，
唔好下下都話人哋死攬條線先得架
[ 本帖最後由 238X 於 2013-10-31 09:16 編輯 ] 原帖由 238X 於 2013-10-31 09:13 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
改路都要諗下順唔順路架大佬，
楊屋道我都忍你，
如果出埋大窩口我不如搭 38A 出去轉
或者索性搭西鐵算數喇。
如果大窩口 + 楊屋道嘅客
大唔過 海濱 + 海灣 + 環宇 (+ 楊屋道)，
咁唔做真係商業決定，
唔好下下都話人哋死 ...
i am giving examples my friend, 238X viaing tai wo hau is not what i want to see, its service area should be boarder
because one route per estate/small area strategy KMB used in the past, will create inequality and inefficient uses of bus resources. FF/ It would be better if 234X have just via allway garden, tai ho road, sha tsui road, tusen wan road to mong kok.
Same for 30X, shortening it to tusen wan mtr viaing tai ho road, sha tsui road, riviera garden, tusen wan road to mk.
I would rather want 34m to extend to sham shui po viaing allway garden, tai chung road, tusen wan road for passengers going cheung sha wan and sham shui po.
Revised 30 (or perhaps even exchange 238M for that), and make tusen mtr as terminus viaing tai ho road, sha tsui road, riviera garden, tusen wan road to cheung sha wan and sham shui po, or maybe even to kowloon city. Make 38A the replacement for lai king hill for route 30. \FF
I don't know if this is possible, i have not thought about the number of buses could be used and about bi-section or section fares yet.
頁:
[1]