ahbong 發表於 2006-4-12 19:23

原帖由 shtsang 於 2006-4-11 00:08 發表

只係西鐵沿線都唔係好多有特色既地方.
如果唔係西鐵咁攪到幾好睇架.

好難睇就真
用花碌碌既 background 配白色字
真係唔知邊個配出黎
老人家唔知點睇喇

KR4210 發表於 2006-4-12 22:36

原帖由 ahbong 於 2006-4-12 19:23 發表


好難睇就真
用花碌碌既 background 配白色字
真係唔知邊個配出黎
老人家唔知點睇喇
咁大隻字都睇唔到o既話隻眼應該係有d問題:L

hk_ayu 發表於 2006-4-12 22:50

原帖由 hksubways 於 2006-4-10 23:29 發表
Check out Translink in Canada or SLRT stations...


What do u want??

I think West Rail in HK is already a very bad example of "over-luxury"

Look at Melbourne,
most suburban stations are just only a very simple cement plate with partly-shelters

hksubways 發表於 2006-4-12 22:58

sa 發表於 2006-4-12 23:07

原帖由 hksubways 於 2006-4-12 22:58 發表


But MOS and ER Shatin and Taiwai stn serve 800 000 people with transit dependcy of 60%+ while Melbourne system has 100+ stations serving 3-4 million only.

MOS line is not serving as much ppl as u state la...

ahbong 發表於 2006-4-13 01:56

原帖由 KR4210 於 2006-4-12 22:36 發表

咁大隻字都睇唔到o既話隻眼應該係有d問題:L

老人家隻眼有問題又有乜咁奇呢?
唔係話隻體大細
而係同背景 contrast 太細
你背景係灰個字係白
稍為反光已經睇唔清楚
明唔明?

ahbong 發表於 2006-4-13 01:58

原帖由 hk_ayu 於 2006-4-12 22:50 發表



What do u want??

I think West Rail in HK is already a very bad example of "over-luxury"

Look at Melbourne,
most suburban stations are just only a very simple cement plate wit ...

西鐵唔係 over-luxury
而係 oversized
幕門或者日本車就等於 luxury?
都不會吧...
頁: 1 [2]
查看完整版本: Ma On Shan Railway