愚問：新加坡／倫敦巴士管理模式比較

睇咗維基，新加坡而家係政府擁有巴士營運資產，然後分組批線比公司做。

想問呢種模式係咪同倫敦嗰套一模一樣？定係其中一邊個營辦商控制／擁有嘅嘢多啲？

倫敦Borismaster係TFL所有,其他路線合約車型由營運商購買.

Vehicles may also be leased instead of being bought outright. In fact operators tend to lease them instead of buying, considering the contract length of a route can run as short as 5 years, it saves the pain of having to get rid of buses they no longer need.

NV58 發表於 2018-11-22 09:28
Vehicles may also be leased instead of being bought outright. In fact operators tend to lease them i ...

In that case, leasing should be much more common in London, considering that most railway rolling stock (whose operators are often under longer franchises) there are also leased.  Is it right?