(轉貼新聞) 國產星洲地鐵現裂紋 同一製造商供應高鐵港鐵
[複製鏈接]
|
聽過商台新聞有講過
港鐵批新車係用不鏽鋼,而不是新加坡地鐵列車所使用的鋁合金
|
|
|
|
|
[指引]
鑑於本主題既牽涉外地亦牽涉本港鐵路,而側重點不同難以簡單地合併討論,現提議以如下方法分工:
.R1板-主要討論港鐵購車事宜,包括外地廠商與港鐵的商業來往、港鐵在過去、現在及將來的表現等,
可借新加坡事件做引子或比較,但不能只討論新加坡事件,討論內容必須以本港鐵路為主體;
.R3板-可以討論新加坡購車及退車等事、廠商與新加坡的瓜葛、廠商在其他國家的表現等,但不能只討論香港鐵路。
本人不能預測所有可能出現之情況,謹此呼籲站友回應時留意文章所屬分板,多謝合作。
admin91
R1/R3分板板主
|
|
|
|
|
但係咁講係咪代表新加坡用鋁合金會容易啲有裂紋,不鏽鋼就會冇先?架車既物料同做工係兩樣野嚟。一個生產商唔係應該用咩物料都確保quality冇問題? |
|
|
|
|
其實只要睇返C751B有冇同樣嘅裂車問題,已經可以得到結論。
強國出品,冇裂先至出奇。
|
|
超智能巴士 Super-Intelligient Bus
|
|
|
感謝提醒,原來SMRT係 黑仔王,
買親車都出事....
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kawasaki_Heavy_Industries_%26_Nippon_Sharyo_C751B
Train withdrawal incidents
On 13 April 2002, a fault was detected in a C751B train and it was subsequently withdrawn to Changi Depot for investigations. As the train was under warranty, the engineers from the manufacturers of the train and gearbox were flown in on 21 April. They subsequently detected metal fragments in the gearboxes, and those of another 20 trains. SMRT immediately withdrew all 21 C751B trains and suspended the Boon Lay – Changi Airport train through service, replacing it with the Tanah Merah – Changi Airport shuttle service. Train frequencies were also adjusted until early May, when 8 trains returned to service. By June 2002, all C751B trains had been returned to service and the through service was resumed.
連日本原廠嘢都會爆大鑊,SMRT採購部一定係請左幾個黑仔王返黎
|
|
支持巴士裝主動安全系統,長遠推駕駛自動化
|
|
|
買歐洲車算吧,似乎對家SBS Transit所營運的路線以及列車較少出現問題。
感覺上,放眼世界,似乎Alstom的地鐵新車在交付後,相對其他廠商所製作的新車較少出現問題。 |
|
|
|
|
會唔會玩
B仔一>北車長春
Alcom一>上海阿爾法通
川崎一>南車四方
結論是Siemens,CAF,其他日本廠會好D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|