原帖由 volvo_chan 於 2007-4-16 09:04 發表
51，想取消又唔得，批爬山Dart退役後(聽講行多2年就退)
51仲唔取消的話，我估九巴唔買新單層行51都唔得。
51比埋陽光做都得:lol
原帖由 HE7921 於 2007-4-17 18:09 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
51比埋陽光做都得:lol
陽光肯唔肯做架... 都要顧下自己盤數吧
51呢D，真係正宗「公益線」:lol
原帖由 S3N92 於 2007-4-16 22:40 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
平治？
樓主現實d啦
要買的話E200dart無走雞...E300就細d機會
雖然九記再買Benz (Evobus) 的出品機會渺茫
不過以車論車
ADL Dart SLF vs MAN Lion's City vs Evobus Citaro
Dart SLF 一定排最尾
離題一問
其實好多九巴唔想做的線
好似53, 51, 14S
乜真係咁易話俾陽光做
就俾陽光做咩?
專利線唔做唔係拎番個專營權俾人投嗎?
同埋專利線點樣可以無啦啦變為非專利線?
同埋陽光一定要做埋九巴的雞肋線?
上面ge問題係咪版友一廂情願的想法呢?
多言了。
原帖由 KC6994 於 2007-4-17 16:51 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
雖然九記再買Benz (Evobus) 的出品機會渺茫
不過以車論車
ADL Dart SLF vs MAN Lion's City vs Evobus Citaro
Dart SLF 一定排最尾
The Dart (and E200Dart) is a midibus, a completely different class of vehicle comparing with full
size Citaro and Lion City. It is lighter, with a short designed life and all round, not as tough as its
heavier competitors.
Mercedes simply hasn't got a product which is really suitable for KMB operation - the Citaro is
not much more economical to run than, let's say, an ADS, which KMB has loads as spares anyway,
and because of its size, it is far less versatile. A point of note for die-hard fans of Mercedes, there
is only one product that really suits KMB at the moment:
http://www.tinywong.talktalk.net/BX06UMM_060530b.jpg
But if you get this, why not get a E200Dart or an Optare Solo instead, both of which are well proven
in the market?
原帖由 S3BL121 於 2007-4-18 01:06 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
離題一問
其實好多九巴唔想做的線
好似53, 51, 14S
乜真係咁易話俾陽光做
就俾陽光做咩?
專利線唔做唔係拎番個專營權俾人投嗎?
同埋專利線點樣可以無啦啦變為非專利線?
同埋陽光一定要做埋九巴的雞肋線?
上面ge問 ...
小弟同意閣下的說法
個位版友的想法未免太簡單了......
居然想到了"直接過戶"的方式 :L
雖然陽光係九巴旗下, 但係呢d係專利路線
就算九巴唔做, 都要拎返出黎公開招標
並不是 "直接過戶" 比陽光做的......