原帖由 expertuser 於 2009-2-26 01:47 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
石油氣安全性比天然氣要更高安全要求?
去現有石氣站入氣，也做不到?油站要改裝呢 :lol
呢層就係因為好少有石油氣既巴士供應，雙層更加冇
其實仲有其他原因，當你搞場大龍鳯
最終原來個廢氣標準係同歐五差唔多，咁不如用舊錢叫人換歐五好過
原帖由 da54 於 2009-2-25 04:10 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
研究引入天然氣巴士，我估可能同西氣東輸計劃有關。
呢 d 相對不設實際的「刷鞋」計劃，廣州已經有辦睇，
唔推行係好事.....
More than that though, diesel technology has moved on so much over the last 10 years that it's on the par, and in some case, cleaner than the gas-powered alternatives (and even petrol-powered hybrids) anyway. That is without the price of investing new infrastructures as well.
I am a bit staggered by the general ignorance by the HK government regarding the development of diesel engines lately actually. If they want a green solution, forget CNG/LPG, try the hybrids - the game has been and keeps moving on, and they will only get better and better.
另類化石燃料只是折衷辦法，長遠應改用氫氣燃料或環保電力，因此不引入天然氣巴士不一定是壞事。
原帖由 ArnoldC 於 2009-2-27 01:07 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
另類化石燃料只是折衷辦法，長遠應改用氫氣燃料或環保電力，因此不引入天然氣巴士不一定是壞事。
Hydrogen-fuel cell係私家車個商用化都唔太理想，引入重型車使用恐怕仲要等多一段長時間:Q
原帖由 ArnoldC 於 2009-2-27 01:07 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
另類化石燃料只是折衷辦法，長遠應改用氫氣燃料或環保電力，因此不引入天然氣巴士不一定是壞事。
氫燃料由製造,貯存,運輸,到使用都係極不理想既一隻燃料
純粹係一場極昂貴既鬧劇
原帖由 manlok 於 2009-2-27 01:29 AM 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
氫燃料由製造,貯存,運輸,到使用都係極不理想既一隻燃料
純粹係一場極昂貴既鬧劇
另外安全性都是一個問題:L
一爆就大煲了:L
原帖由 NV58 於 2009-2-26 03:02 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
More than that though, diesel technology has moved on so much over the last 10 years that it's on the par, and in some case, cleaner than the gas-powered alternatives (and even petrol-powered hybrid ...
Totally agree with you! LPG/CNG are 'outdated' technology! Government should think ahead using hybrid or anything new! By the way, they should ask someone to monitor the situation of London to see whether it is possible for Hong Kong.
Remember those designline buses in Hong Kong???
One solution is to borrow a E400h from Alexander Dennis and see if it can run smoothly in Hong Kong and then carry out necessary improvement and incorporate into E500s or whatever new.
原帖由 hkstudent 於 2009-2-27 07:06 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
另外安全性都是一個問題:L
一爆就大煲了:L
有咁多氫氣比你燒先算啦！氫氣咁輕，一漏出來就升咗上太空啦！
仲有，有何數據指出氫氣爆炸比汽油/石油氣/天然氣爆炸大鑊？最出名嘅興登堡號飛船爆炸大部分人係因為驚，自己跳"船"而跌死嘅，而兩個燒死嘅人都係因為飛船上嘅柴油燃料著火引致嘅，所以都唔太關氫氣事。
其實天然氣巴士呢樣野之前係Brisbane爆過一次架
不過好彩係廠入面爆姐...
張相唔記邊度download返黎啦...sorry