norrislaw在 2005-11-17 22:50 發表:
我想billmf兄對呢方面最清楚
不過個人意見係, 甘泉背後既資金可以營運得到間公司有幾耐係一個問題
而且要維修6架744需要一定資金(又是還請billmf兄代答),甘泉真的afford得起嗎?
講真,我覺得甘泉未必afford得到,單係買個幾架二手744都用左唔少,二黎翻新機身外圍同埋引擎都用左唔少錢,所以我斷估甘泉應該唔會翻身機艙喇,除非甘泉有一定既capital喇,否則無可能......#:P#:P
有個想法, 甘泉會否使用UA的灰加藍 (再貼上自己的名字)作為COLOUR SCHEME??
翻身機艙一定沒有可能, 大家可能要有心理準備甘泉可能好似泰東/ 天鷹既模式
kychung在 2005-10-31 17:49 發表:
anyway
該公司ge出路極有可能就係成為"基督教指定航空公司"
每次都要全機人祈禱完先至起飛
到達時又要再"感謝恩典"至開艙門放人走
Hahaha this is a funny analogy - good one!
Back to the topic, lets not be too pessimistic, for a successful business, theres always going to be a starting point.
They are obviously trying to open up a new market trend, and taking on the risks involved. Personally, I would not mind travelling on a long distance low cost airline, as long as the airfare is cheap and provide me with a reliable and safe ride, that's all it matters. I can bring my own entertainment, MP3 players can keep me happy for more than 20 hours #8)
billlmf在 2005-11-18 02:14 AM 發表:
講真,我覺得甘泉未必afford得到,單係買個幾架二手744都用左唔少,二黎翻新機身外圍同埋引擎都用左唔少錢,所以我斷估甘泉應該唔會翻身機艙喇,除非甘泉有一定既capital喇,否則無可能......#:P#:P
搭單問：
當時國泰向新航購買存放沙漠既744，
前新航744由沙漠到達廈門後有幾多手尾要跟的？
kychung在 2005-10-31 03:49 PM 發表:
響 low cost 長途呢個概念仲未被證明係咪受歡迎之前
一開始就用到744呢D咁大ge機種
我始終覺得係自信爆棚ge表現
(雖然買763ER又飛得唔夠遠 772ER又隨時仲貴過744)
該公司響網頁度聲稱要恪守聖經原則
不過又 ...
Long Haul Low Cost好似係當年People Express既慨念..
KS在 2005-10-30 02:50 AM 發表:
佢唔係冇講,
係你自己睇得唔清楚姐!!!
網頁已經寫左係飛去 倫敦格域(Gatwick)機場 啦!!!
[ Last edited by KS on 2005-10-30 at 02:55 ]
Even I was wrong at the first place, there is no way to be rude to other people and using "!!!" after each sentence. I think you should beware of your manner when replying posts.
norrislaw在 2005-11-21 01:55 AM 發表:
Even I was wrong at the first place, there is no way to be rude to other people and using "!!!" after each sentence. I think you should beware of your manner when replying posts.
首先,
我不嬲回文都經常用 "!!!" ,
都冇俾人話過
而今次我用 "!!!" 係因為覺得你o既回文有d奇怪,
既然你係個網頁睇倒 d 飛機會飛去 柏林、科隆 / 波恩,
點解會睇唔倒會飛去 倫敦格域 呢!
另外,
請問版規有冇寫明 "!!!" 係 rude 咁o既意思呢?
如果真係有,
我會收回我之前同埋今次所用o既 "!!!" ,
並向你作出道歉
既然版友 gakei 指站規應該係有寫不可以使用過多歎號,
可能我少上網啦, 唔知咩野叫網絡禮誼,
我現在正式向版友 norrislaw 道歉,
對唔住, sorry
並收回我之前同埋今次所用o既 "!!!"
[ Last edited by KS on 2005-11-21 at 17:56 ]
站規應該係有寫不可以使用過多歎號,
另外這也不符合一般網絡禮誼。
KS在 2005-11-21 15:05 發表:
首先,
我不嬲回文都經常用 "!!!" ,
都冇俾人話過
而今次我用 "!!!" 係因為覺得你o既回文有d奇怪,
既然你係個網頁睇倒 d 飛機會飛去 柏林、科隆 / 波恩,
點解會睇唔倒會飛去 倫敦格域 ...
KS在 2005-11-21 03:05 PM 發表:
首先,
我不嬲回文都經常用 "!!!" ,
都冇俾人話過
而今次我用 "!!!" 係因為覺得你o既回文有d奇怪,
既然你係個網頁睇倒 d 飛機會飛去 柏林、科隆 / 波恩,
點解會睇唔倒會飛去 倫敦格域 ...
I accept your apologie and lets move forward, shall we?
And thanks to Gakei to explain this for me.
norrislaw在 2005-11-17 10:50 PM 發表:
我想billmf兄對呢方面最清楚
不過個人意見係, 甘泉背後既資金可以營運得到間公司有幾耐係一個問題
而且要維修6架744需要一定資金(又是還請billmf兄代答),甘泉真的afford得起嗎?
Well... I think Oasis HK do have enough funding to back them up to maintain few jets... Also they would only have 2 to begin operation with... And a while ago, I have read a article about Oasis HK and its founder and it is relatively strong backing too...