kingprowm 發表於 2010-7-5 20:20

DENNIS 低地台車設計點解好少話有刮底問題

好多時聽到 VOLVO/SCANIA/NEOPLAN/MAN 經過某些地方會有刮底問題,
但 DENNIS 通常又冇乜呢個問題, 到底佢既設計相比其他有甚麼優勝之處 :handshake

blueblue 發表於 2010-7-5 20:26

dennis其實細心看我覺得車身好高...
neoplan 好似未聽過, 因為車身都唔矮

~~Knysna~~ 發表於 2010-7-5 20:49

原帖由 blueblue 於 2010-7-5 20:26 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
neoplan 好似未聽過, 因為車身都唔矮
neoplan 好似唔入得鑽地

KZ9314@YCC 發表於 2010-7-5 21:30

會唔會係同Dennis低地台車用中軸謳動有關?

superay 發表於 2010-7-5 21:46

原帖由 blueblue 於 2010-7-5 08:26 PM 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
dennis其實細心看我覺得車身好高...
neoplan 好似未聽過, 因為車身都唔矮

好多Dennis低地台雙層車,第一級已經接近非低地台車的一級半距離

cx7 發表於 2010-7-5 22:13

原帖由 ~~Knysna~~ 於 2010-7-5 20:49 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif

neoplan 好似唔入得鑽地
:lolNot because it will 刮底.NWFB think's that if it's 60xx broken down in tunnel,the tow car will hurt its chassis.Because Neoplan Centroliner's chassis uses牙籤陣design.And also,a 60xx was broken down in EHT long time ago and the computer inside locked the bus,the bus can't move and have to wait a long period to tow it away.:(

fokck 發表於 2010-7-5 22:43

原帖由 cx7 於 2010-7-5 22:13 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif

:lolNot because it will 刮底.NWFB think's that if it's 60xx broken down in tunnel,the tow car will hurt its chassis.Because Neoplan Centroliner's chassis uses牙籤陣design.And also,a 60xx was broken d ...


?? The boardmate is talking about Diamond Hill Station....

The use of Neoplan in routes 74X, 75X is forbidden due to Diamond
Hill Station's geographical incompability with Neoplan. Some may argue
that 75X used Neoplan before, as far as I know all those incidences were
all single-direction trips to Kowloon City Ferry ONLY, which bypasses
Diamond Hill. Return trips of 75X run by Neoplan is unheard.

Similar case was reported regarding China Ferry Terminal which involves
3C, 14, 238X. When 5-S31 changed to use Neoplan as schedule years before,
the original order to 3C was cancelled and switched to 5-S01
sounded due to the problem of terminus


[ 本帖最後由 fokck 於 2010-7-6 01:13 編輯 ]

ASV50 發表於 2010-7-5 22:58

原帖由 fokck 於 2010-7-5 22:43 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif

Similar case was reported regarding China Ferry Terminal which involves
3C, 14, 238X. When 5-S31 changed to use Neoplan as schedule years before,
the original order to 3C was cancelled and switched to 5-S01
sounded due to the problem of terminus
仲有就係以前259D九龍灣廠掛AP既時候
固定柯打14既12車只可以係2部ATR輪
2部AP輪另外2個字軌

da93 發表於 2010-7-5 23:18

原帖由 ~~Knysna~~ 於 2010-7-5 20:49 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif

neoplan 好似唔入得鑽地

仲記得好耐以前,
好似話連金車都唔入得,
後來加下加下,
先有ATS(以前84M果D),
之後又有豬

kitarolo 發表於 2010-7-6 21:53

原帖由 da93 於 2010-7-5 23:18 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif

仲記得好耐以前,
好似話連金車都唔入得,
後來加下加下,
先有ATS(以前84M果D),
之後又有豬

這張相可見連大白龍亦幾乎刮地(右前輪附近)
不過今日這車的位置已重新鋪過,故可用躉/豬,
但亦未有聽聞可用 Neoplan
頁: [1] 2
查看完整版本: DENNIS 低地台車設計點解好少話有刮底問題