Exterior photo (of the Wright prototype) is also available: http://www.hkitalk.net/SPT/viewthread.php?tid=1871&extra=page%3D1&page=7
This also means the prototype is already here. :lol
Cool shot. Only thing is the livery application is not as good as I was hoping. They can do without all that violet at the bumper area. 原帖由 NV58 於 2010-9-8 03:45 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Cool shot. Only thing is the livery application is not as good as I was hoping. They can do without all that violet at the bumper area.
Exactly... I think the designer for the livery has some serious problem with artwork... :lol 新加坡果部樣版好似係曲梯? 原帖由 SBS7483U 於 2010-9-8 00:56 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
True, but it is definitely better looking than gemilang buses. having 1103 (include 8031 8033 and 7888)from sbst alone is already awful. And gemilang has made the local buses look so cheap.
I would...
But I prefer K230UB with Gemilang bodywork rather than Caetano as the interior design is much better.
Moreover, it has rear window and better heat-proof ( just my feeling), by comparing to Caetano.
As an old saying goes, the grass is always greener on the other side.:lol
回復 24# 的帖子
True! I think the Caetano body looks better on K310. The K230 looks better with Gemilang.Many SG bus fans dislike the Gemilang, probably the reason being the K230s. deleted post wrong
[ 本帖最後由 TIB1232Z 於 2010-9-14 17:23 編輯 ]