呢個係小弟觀察.... 其實港島區路線上，頂閘都好少會企到超載....
好多人都唔願意企得太貼，例如 E500 可以企 44/43 人，但好多時連 40 人都無....
而家新車裝對頭位
相比以前城記裝橫排凳
的確係少左令人想企入車廂內部的意慾 原帖由 kay 於 2010-11-30 09:38 PM 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
講開又講，7001都留廠兩星期，
有無人知衰左d乜?
同埋我估7500係法定企位上會有驚喜.....
係7000
因為爆油喉:L 點解車隊編號係7500?
7002~7049係邊/ 原帖由 AshiyaMizuki 於 2010-12-1 23:07 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
點解車隊編號係7500?
7002~7049係邊/
點解車隊編號唔可以係7500呀!? -,- 呢架又唔係E400，開新車隊編號好正常姐 . . .
回復 25# 的帖子
算la....土檢輸都要哪渣沙ge咕扯太睇下行赤柱線咩景況 原帖由 YYF 於 2010-12-1 06:09 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
整完之後載客量由原訂的 84 人變 85 人, 拆走樓上五個座位變成樓下的六個企位, 值唔值?
睇返部車的載客量, 似乎部車的重量最多只能係
18,000-(57*85)-75=13,080kg ...
That sounds about right, considering a B9TL in the UK weighs a bit over 12,000kg empty.
The problem I heard during a discussion with a Wrightbus staff about the HK pair is not a simple overweight, but rather an overload of the rear axle. The problem actually has affected more on 7500, because it has fitted a supplement heating system within the main air-cond system, which upsets the balance of the bus as a whole. That is why the rear row of the seats upstairs have to go. The KMB one, on the other hand, hasn't got the heating module in the air-cond and could have got away without taking out the seats, but they did it anyway.
Apparently Wrightbus have actually proposed using lighter seats - a common theme in Britain nowadays - to reduce weight even further, but neither KMB or Citybus were warm with the idea. Had that happen, from what I have been told, each seat should save 3kg, which translate to a little over another 3 passengers.
And of course, the same can also go with the E400 as well. 原帖由 NV58 於 2010-12-2 05:59 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
That sounds about right, considering a B9TL in the UK weighs a bit over 12,000kg empty.
The problem I heard during a discussion with a Wrightbus staff about the HK pair is not a simple overweight,...
The suprise is coming, as history, the KMB fleet were mostly fitted with the heating module, but CTB without heating module.
Why KMB get smart to reduce the heating module on this Volvo B9? :lol 原帖由 DK704_3N133 於 2010-12-1 23:16 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
算la....土檢輸都要哪渣沙ge
咕扯太睇下行赤柱線咩景況 人地過到就一定有原因，你唔抵得既咪當睇架車唔到囉，成日上來嘈都冇意思的！ 原帖由 AshiyaMizuki 於 2010-12-1 23:07 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
點解車隊編號係7500?
7002~7049係邊/
新創建已加單購買38部E400，所以要預留7000系編號
回復 38# 的帖子
卽係咁，輸咗頭Round 學似上面咁自行無視企位後讚揚ge話我做吾到，亦須要開口。