原帖由 238X 於 2013-7-28 20:58 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
一定有原因，會唔會係 62X 蝕錢，
甚至好似 51 咁，做多個蝕多個 (雖則應該未至於咁極端)？
62X冇咩理由會蝕錢喎
次次坐親都差唔多打爆部車
I think the problem for routes traveling between Tuen Mun <-> Kowloon East is that the non-peak hours may not have enough passengers to cover the cost.
Therefore, KMB may not be willing to extend the service hours of 62X.
****************
In my opinion, I do think Tuen Mun Town Centre should have direct bus service to East Kowloon.
If KMB insists 259D skipping Tuen Mun Town Centre, then I think KMB should consider whether it should reorganize the routes of 258D and 259D during non-peak hours,
e.g. 258D having similar routes with 960 in Tuen Mun... :handshake
唔交代轉乘問題都唔應該容許259D skip市中心
原帖由 JC8385 於 2013-7-29 00:08 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
唔交代轉乘問題都唔應該容許259D skip市中心
有站友已指出259D不入屯門市中心已經撤回
http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/redirect.php?tid=785927 (#276)
259D 一定 skip 唔到市中心同安友,因為班區議員同居民會大力反對 :lol
何況 259d 非繁個客源響市中心同安友,冇理由要 skip
計客量，其實應該62X全日，259D兩味就岩:lol
62X短過259D,照計咁做非繁慳得更多，而且唔駛唔同時段唔同方向等車
btw, 假日就應該用番259D全日並經屯中較理想
[ 本帖最後由 LAK2 於 2013-7-29 01:32 編輯 ]
原帖由 BlackBird 於 2013-7-28 21:14 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
62x 都蝕錢?班班都爆,應該賺唔少 :o
開足全日 又點趕你搭259D呢
叫佢CUT259D做兩味佢又未敢
反而放多兩三架車就做埋62X果份 唔開有著數
個人認為加埋258D 入轉車站仲好 可以幫259D 分擔一部份轉車客
259D只飛屯市巴總又是否可行呢？
原帖由 20030311 於 2013-7-31 10:15 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
259D只飛屯市巴總又是否可行呢？ 一定好大回響,除非62X全日由富泰開經景峰!