  
 
當年做巴士迷仲係入世未深,只知呢架車係樣板車比較特別,同埋樓下車尾窗係凹左入去,十分騎呢    
 
最深印象係架車有一排行過 86K,放學之後較 o岩時間等黎坐,當時既滿足感,比起現今坐到新車首日航來得更強烈,可能我對現今巴士的熱情已經慢慢減退中 ..... |   
 
評分
- 
查看全部評分
 
 
 
 
 
 |  
| 
 | 
 
 
| 
 | 
 
| 
 | 
 
 
 
呢架車係咪掛過 Rt.89D 呀? 我果時坐過 
佢o既. 雖然我一上車, 有浸油漆味, 但係 
到依家都仲回味無窮! |   
 
 
 
 |  
| 
 獨派交通迷同政治學人 
 | 
 
 
| 
 | 
 
| 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 |  
| 
 Idiotism is idiots being idiotic 
 | 
 
 
| 
 | 
 
| 
 | 
 
 
 
原帖由 dicksonboy 於 2008-1-10 20:23 發表   
 
 
never rode 3N3 before, so i cant say anything about its performance 
but rode 3N2 @ 6C & 49X  
if 174 was slow, then 3N2 didn't move at all~ 
i assume 3N3 was just as bad as 3N2   
 
但我記得有42A的司機說,她的車速有7X公里。 
 
兒時,樣板3N常常到6號線「客串」,當時能乘坐她們會有驚喜的感覺。 
到了97年,有一次3N2跑42時,有候車的人說︰ 
 
「嘩!呢架巴士咁攪o野o既!」  |   
 
 
 
 |  
| 
 古競豪 
 | 
 
 
| 
 | 
 
| 
 | 
 
 
 
原帖由 dicksonboy 於 2008-1-10 20:23 發表   
 
 
never rode 3N3 before, so i cant say anything about its performance 
but rode 3N2 @ 6C & 49X  
if 174 was slow, then 3N2 didn't move at all~ 
i assume 3N3 was just as bad as 3N2   
 
3N3..good gar, performance i felt really not bad. 
i took 81C, 87D and 82M.... 
my friend took 680 tim... 
 
for 174...took 81....really SLOW.... |   
 
 
 
 |  
| 
 | 
 
 
| 
 | 
 
| 
 | 
 
 
 
原帖由 alan680x 於 2008-1-10 23:42 發表   
 
 
3N3..good gar, performance i felt really not bad. 
i took 81C, 87D and 82M.... 
my friend took 680 tim... 
 
for 174...took 81....really SLOW....   
 
果次搭174行87, 車殼就驚喜, 坐就勁唔舒服, 可能因為頂閘, 龍翔道行得極慢, 見住38 兩部頂閘3N爬頭, 即刻無名火起  |   
 
 
 
 |  
| 
 GK9636@ATENVIRO 
 | 
 
 
| 
 | 
 
| 
 | 
 
 
 
 
 
 | 
 Advertisement 
Advertisement 
Advertisement 
Advertisement 
Advertisement 
 |