|
Cathay 888...clear to land rwy 26 Right
|
|
|
原帖由 billlmf 於 2006-2-1 03:06 發表
波音係繼739ER之後,另一款Extended Range系列既737NG產品推出喇,launch customer係ANA~~
[url=http://www.boeing.com/commercial/737family/news/2006/q1/060131a_nr.html]Boeing Launches Longest-Range 737 ...
10200公里...
咁WestJet果d要飛長途咪好著數...
咁細隻開多d點對點都冇壞咯 |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 8888888888 於 2006-2-1 10:46 發表
10200公里...
咁WestJet果d要飛長途咪好著數...
咁細隻開多d點對點都冇壞咯
如果十幾個鐘屈o係個窄體艙我相信好多人都會只此一次,下不為例。 |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 sq285 於 2006-2-1 11:31 發表
如果十幾個鐘屈o係個窄體艙我相信好多人都會只此一次,下不為例。
以前707-320C咪又係咁飛.. |
|
|
|
|
大家記住要做到咁長距離,架機要加9個副油箱先得。你估下有冇航空公司會加9個副油箱飛?
不過我估佢唔係要來同 Airbus A320/321競爭,我估佢係想用來代替 757-200 飛大西洋線。
今期唔知點解o的 ETOPS 757 好好去,CO/AA 買完/改完 冇耐 ,US 就 lease o左3架 ex-ATA o既757 (有傳會lease 10架飛大西洋線) |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 sq285 於 2006-2-1 11:31 發表
如果十幾個鐘屈o係個窄體艙我相信好多人都會只此一次,下不為例。
咁有良心o既公司唔會用盡呢126個位
以長途黎講, 多數載90-108個左右 |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 8888888888 於 2006-2-2 00:49 發表
咁有良心o既公司唔會用盡呢126個位
以長途黎講, 多數載90-108個左右
I believe they wont be able to fit as many seats... Reason being weight restriction... Since the aircraft have added extra fuel tank, which means the weight of fuel would increase if they fill all the tank... But without any change at their maximum take-off/landing weight, the aircraft would need to reduce seats to match the restriction...
At the same time, they would require more toilet onboard too rather than the usual 3 on a narrow-body jet... They may need 4/5 toilet to cope with the need on some longer range flight... |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 manlok 於 2006-2-1 11:42 發表
以前707-320C咪又係咁飛..
But back at B707 time, there wasnt any other long-haul jet option so airlines have to use them... And also the standard that pax want has changed since B707-300C launched which was nearly 50yrs ago already... |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 sq285 於 2006-2-1 11:31 發表
如果十幾個鐘屈o係個窄體艙我相信好多人都會只此一次,下不為例。
如果都系坐econ class 既話窄體同廣體都差唔多。
坐少d人其實都有好處。 |
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|