我就咁聽您講,我覺得似係警方諗果個方向多喎~
*偷車邊會打爆車尾雞翼窗o架﹗如果真係識偷o既,用一把長鋼尺,一支一字螺絲批,一把剪鉗已經可以偷到車啦﹗
唔係鼓吹偷車,但係我o係 IVE 時阿 Sir 有教,我亦試過~
[ 本帖最後由 FX8173 於 2006-6-9 15:42 編輯 ] |
|
NISSAN Presage 2.4 CVTC
|
|
|
原帖由 FX8173 於 2006-6-9 15:41 發表
我就咁聽您講,我覺得似係警方諗果個方向多喎~
*偷車邊會打爆車尾雞翼窗o架﹗如果真係識偷o既,用一把長鋼尺,一支一字螺絲批,一把剪鉗已經可以偷到車啦﹗
唔係鼓吹偷車,但係我o係 IVE 時阿 Sir 有教, ...
但係警方都有兩個意向,只不過想以刑事毁壞處理! |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 GK9398 於 2006-6-9 19:21 發表
但係警方都有兩個意向,只不過想以刑事毁壞處理!
您架車車箱內有無o野放o係度先,例如散紙、車內裝飾等~?
因為睇表面證供,真係似刑毀多D~ |
|
NISSAN Presage 2.4 CVTC
|
|
|
原帖由 FX8173 於 2006-6-9 20:02 發表
您架車車箱內有無o野放o係度先,例如散紙、車內裝飾等~?
因為睇表面證供,真係似刑毀多D~
沒有!因為公司車!
一些警員認為刑毀不會破壞雞翼窗同把指揮燈"縛線","縛線"的是專業爆車,
既然專業,就非刑毀般簡單,所以就認為偷野多,但偷車同偷物件就未能
肯定,而一些警員認為是刑毀,甚至話打雷打中,據鄰居(警署文職)指係
想借意了結 |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 GK9398 於 2006-6-9 20:17 發表
沒有!因為公司車!
一些警員認為刑毀不會破壞雞翼窗同把指揮燈"縛線","縛線"的是專業爆車,
既然專業,就非刑毀般簡單,所以就認為偷野多,但偷車同偷物件就未能
肯定,而一些警 ...
俾雷打中就牽強o左D…唔通劈到燈都甩咩……
*雷係唔會打中o野o既,閃電先會~ |
|
NISSAN Presage 2.4 CVTC
|
|
|
原帖由 FX8173 於 2006-6-9 20:39 發表
俾雷打中就牽強o左D…唔通劈到燈都甩咩……
*雷係唔會打中o野o既,閃電先會~
所以,呢兩個人真係求其找個理由打發我,另外果幾個都絕不認同,
老實講,唔係公司車真係整番就算..... |
|
|
|
|
Well, if you know anyone with Legal background, bring them along next time, then the police will not just "give u an answer" and tell you go to away, few years ago, my Audi A4 was scarched and window broke by someone, the police said maybe it was just some kid...and tell me to go away after taken my statement, the next day, I bring along my sister (lawyer) and demand an investigation and also meet with a sergent, 2 weeks later, after they look at security camera from the car park (we obtain from Wilson through legal letter...) they arrested a tri-member (who happen to get the wrong Audi, because another Audi look like mind cut him off once and he thought it was mind, the was charged with vandalising my car, and attempted vandalism of the another Audi, (who's driver happen to be one of the CID's friend...)
原帖由 GK9398 於 2006-6-9 20:52 發表
所以,呢兩個人真係求其找個理由打發我,另外果幾個都絕不認同,
老實講,唔係公司車真係整番就算..... |
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|