又有一架A346出事

原帖由 wally 於 2007-11-17 19:32 發表

大鑊野就好似只係得呢兩單... 而細鑊就好似唔只,有其他事件啦... 不過都無人受傷...
上次有架VS係HKG起飛返LHR既時候機尾hi到個跑道... 之後要放油飛返HKG... ...

細鑊既仲有上次有架MU(花機個架)係上海Landing時爆軚

不過值得提提係係隻華航742由刮尾到出事解體之間相差十多年。

原帖由 lam926 於 2007-11-18 08:31 發表


呢個一定係安全問題
果陣華航空中解體單野其中一個原因就係之前部機 tail strike
番到台灣 冇點理到 照飛 所以中招...

今次係咪有兩架A346被written off？

原帖由 tomchanhk 於 2007-11-18 19:00 發表

細鑊既仲有上次有架MU(花機個架)係上海Landing時爆軚

爆軚就同飛機本身的設計冇關係吧

只是保養做得唔好

原帖由 nwfb1110 於 2007-11-19 21:48 發表
今次係咪有兩架A346被written off？

好唔好彩... 係兩架都written off... 無計啦... 咁炒法... 想整返都幾難... 我整過架新既出黎重快...

原帖由 wally 於 2007-11-19 18:50 發表

好唔好彩... 係兩架都written off... 無計啦... 咁炒法... 想整返都幾難... 我整過架新既出黎重快...

No, the Iberia one is still being assessed and some parts are said to be flown in already. However, Airbus confirmed that the Ethiad A346 will not be repaired.

I'm surprised the Iberia plane can be repaired at reasonable cost.  The landing gear must have collapsed, leading to major structural damage.

原帖由 fai 於 2007-11-19 10:58 發表
不過值得提提係係隻華航742由刮尾到出事解體之間相差十多年。

保養得唔好都未必即刻出事，JAL123咪又隔左一輪先出事

原帖由 superchan7 於 2007-11-19 20:52 發表
I'm surprised the Iberia plane can be repaired at reasonable cost.  The landing gear must have collapsed, leading to major structural damage.

It depends on how you define as "reasonable" though. The bottom line is, the aircraft will not be written off so long as its value exceed the repair cost by a respectable margin. The aircraft itself is still very new, only 1 year old, which will work to its favour as well.

Obviously, inspection will be made to ensure the overall structural integrity of the airframe has not been compromised as well. Then again, quite a number of airliners suffered similar kind of damages as well, and got repair and returned to service.

算吧﹗﹗我早就對巴士A346失望無數次~~

其實﹐Etihad單野就真係人為疏忽﹐好明顯就係無放chocks係nose gear或者main gear﹐又或者架機本身無set parking brake~~