建議將馬線不分拆+飛坑寶(將南特快) 及 坑寶改開將元線264

其實做唔到欖隧轉乘 可以做九巴好鍾意做既yoho轉乘 係錦田人由轉251A/B 改為轉64K/54/77K之嘛  同埋天水圍客受罪(咁依你既思路開番條經屯門去天水圍囉…)

lsc04d11 發表於 2020-6-23 06:35
其實做唔到欖隧轉乘 可以做九巴好鍾意做既yoho轉乘 係錦田人由轉251A/B 改為轉64K/54/77K之嘛  同埋天水圍 ...

N969嗰種情況
可能想省欖隧收費
或凌時做埋屯門客

整得欖隧,車費按里數而唔理
收費道路咪由得營運商計吓值
唔值得開,日間線諗唔到咩嘢理由
元天行九幹去東九嚟虐待車長同乘客

經大埔即使不停站都要食觀繞
塞車,仲有吐公/老隧呢……元朗
天水圍現時去將軍澳多數都8C/
9C去咗黃大仙轉0066,去得將工
嘅就多數有員接。

建議太和至上村間站站停，方便沿線村民接駁欖隧

miklcct 發表於 2020-6-23 13:48
建議太和至上村間站站停，方便沿線村民接駁欖隧

如果264線打算主打長途客，上面有板友講緊經林錦本身已經慢到可能要ban(改經環迴?)，
更有板友指出經大埔都直頭太慢(改經欖隧?)，似乎再停晒林錦沿途各站唔太可行......


如果太和至上村球場嘅乘客想有巴士直車往欖隧，不如等251AB/64K重組？

lsc04d11 發表於 2020-6-23 06:35
其實做唔到欖隧轉乘 可以做九巴好鍾意做既yoho轉乘 係錦田人由轉251A/B 改為轉64K/54/77K之嘛  同埋天水圍 ...

係咪意思 264 改行環迴直達 YOHO 會更好？

miklcct 發表於 2020-6-23 13:48
建議太和至上村間站站停，方便沿線村民接駁欖隧

得
取消64K咯
咁鬼長既路線仲要中間站站停
我搭290/A/B荃灣轉車唔好

不如飛林錦直入元朗? 未來有雙向分段收費，並欖隧轉車站依櫃會更細

ViviTse 發表於 2020-6-22 01:55
謝謝意見，逐點回覆：

For the TKO-Ma On Shan route, I think there should be two routes: Po Lam/Hang Hau and TKO to Ma On Shan so passengers from North TKO won't have to change buses, which is another pro in this situation as you've also got to compete with the MTR. Or else, passengers from North TKO would likely want to take the MTR instead as it is more direct. There should be limited stops (only main stops) in Ma On Shan to raise efficiency.

For the TKO-Yuen Long route, you should stop at Tai Po, Fanling and Sheung Shui (like W3 stops) and at last Yuen Long. Would you consider extending it to Tin Shui Wai and/or extending 290 to Tuen Mun?

Personally I don't agree with the route going via Lam Tsuen Road because it takes so long and it would require a smaller bus which is not efficient. Also, the road has a lot of curves which increase traffic accidents and people might get dizzy.

240798790262289 發表於 2020-7-9 19:16
不如飛林錦直入元朗? 未來有雙向分段收費，並欖隧轉車站依櫃會更細

謝謝建議。如果屯元天D路線有雙向分段收費，咁的確可以太和站直達形點嘅。
但請問如果改行環迴驚唔驚塞？