倫敦唔再入新掛接巴士!!??

might be an interesting picture for us spotters to shoot at Victoria??

之前睇Buses 講o係London 奧運之前會有定案...暫時考慮既係新Routemaster 同埋三軸雙層車(有空調)

其實我覺得用三軸車既機會係大D......不過到時去到London 既街頭感覺就好似企o係彌敦道咁

原帖由 smal 於 2008-3-19 03:36 發表
might be an interesting picture for us spotters to shoot at Victoria??

d RM RML又未拆哂既, 叫First / Stagecoach係全英國/Socland 班哂d 未退既RM/RML返呢

都應該砌得番呢個景既......不過LT就算復古都係想One hand多

原帖由 S3BL343@66 於 2008-3-18 17:55 發表


可以同鑯巴，嶼巴溝通下

如果香港可以入掛接巴士就好了 :lol

鐵巴506,K76....
嶼巴37,38

可惜現在香港巴士公司的廠房維修設備容不下18米長的巴士.
而且掛接巴士司機是否需要第20類「掛接式車輛」駕駛執照.
他們的工資會否比其他司機高?

另外, 政府會否放寬呢?

原帖由 CMB 於 2008-3-19 10:14 發表

如果香港可以入掛接巴士就好了

鐵巴506,K76....
嶼巴37,38

可惜現在香港巴士公司的廠房維修設備容不下18米長的巴士.
而且掛接巴士司機是否需要第20類「掛接式車輛」駕駛執照.
他們的工資會否比其 ...

使乜諗咁遠.......倫敦唔用o者...又唔係其他英國城市唔用...掟晒出去就得啦

原帖由 S3N92 於 2008-3-19 10:49 發表

使乜諗咁遠.......倫敦唔用o者...又唔係其他英國城市唔用...掟晒出去就得啦

嘩...加加埋埋成3百幾架
到時d掛接的分散度遍佈全英國都似

原帖由 wrightap 於 2008-3-19 14:04 發表
嘩...加加埋埋成3百幾架
到時d掛接的分散度遍佈全英國都似

曼谷都得.....幫511變全BENZ掛接巴士

[ 本帖最後由 89B 於 2008-3-19 23:03 編輯 ]

原帖由 89B 於 2008-3-19 23:01 發表


曼谷都得.....幫511變全BENZ掛接巴士

511睇怕最多要得　１／１０　即４ｘ架．．
其餘的．．．．

＊５１１係超級流水線？

原帖由 lcl 於 2008-3-18 23:31 發表


香港未使要到... 又唔係行唔到雙層巴士

一係問o下澳門d巴士公司 ............

俾 NLB 行 38 呢~
咁就唔洗 2 分鐘一班~

原帖由 sunnykam 於 2008-3-18 17:35 發表
要上落快, 不如學歐洲其他城市咁用三門巴士啦, 12米, 靈活D~
架新ROUTEMASTER不倫不類...況且ROUTEMASTER出名嘅唔止係個CONDUCTOR, 仲有佢夠耐用, 維修簡單, 唔係由電腦話事 ...

The problem of a 3 door 12m rigid is that much of the manufacturers in Europe are based in continental Europe, and their products are inevitably focused on left hand drive operations, so there is nothing that can really fit 3 doors in a 12m length. The other thing is fitting 3 doors on a bus of that size means you will lose a substantial amount of seats as well, which Londoners do not like either. In any case, the Citaro Gs are quite agile. They can basically go anywhere a 10.6m Dart can go, albeit taking up almost twice the road space to do so.

So much I miss the RMs, any new Routemaster is simply a no-go. People don't understand that things move on over the years, and the old hop-on-hop-off operations is no longer legally deemed safe. This is one of the many reasons, amongst increasing service cost, aging fleet, why the RMs were taken out of service 3 years ago. Yes, the decision is largely political as well, but one must concede that th new "Pay as you board" (PAYB) scheme is just as, if not even more, efficient on the operational point of view. As for fare-dodgers, the problem is TfL never put enough ticket inspectors on buses. Had they done that, the problem wouldn't have been as bad as it is at the moment.

From the beginning, I only believe artics have a very small place to stay in London - the Red Arrow, and putting them on other services (except the 207, perhaps) is simply silly. London is much better off sticking with double deckers. If they need increased capacity, just go for bigger ones like Lothians Buses of Edinburgh, which operates a fleet of 11m B7TLs and B9TLs, or Dublin Bus, which operates 70 tri-axle B9TLs.