小弟時常往返大陸,發覺乘坐東鐵很多時沒位坐,在九龍塘轉乘地鐵
要行一段路,乘地鐵時亦多數沒有位坐,如此足足要企個多小時...
如果有路線,可以由東九龍直駁至東鐵站,行車時間做到和接駁地鐵差
不多,巴士站與車站距離不太遠(方便拉著行李乘客),提供舒適座位,
是否有可為呢?
例如, Rt.74x改以太和為終站, Rt.80站位與大圍站拉近?
甚至開辨由大學至廣田路線, 行經大老山隧道,轉上新清水灣道避開地鐵沿線,經四順,秀茂坪及興田. |
|
|
|
|
[ref=414232]Dolphin[/ref] 在 2005-11-6 09:26 PM 發表:
小弟時常往返大陸,發覺乘坐東鐵很多時沒位坐,在九龍塘轉乘地鐵
要行一段路,乘地鐵時亦多數沒有位坐,如此足足要企個多小時...
如果有路線,可以由東九龍直駁至東鐵站,行車時間做到和接駁地鐵差
不多,巴 ...
其實冇乜必要咁改啦…
如果乘客真係拉住行李,
咁搭巴士都唔方便啦~
況且巴士又要左兜右兜,
個總站響火車站又點?
70X總站夠係響火車站隔離囉…
不過響北區兜一頭半個鐘先上到公路,
俾係搭唔搭?
加上,觀塘好似有過境快線(旅遊巴),
講方便,搭哩d車仲方便,又快捷。 |
|
=0=
|
|
|
Does Tai Wo B/T have space to cope with 74X??? A route with so many buses???
About 80, no problem, just make it go via Tai Wai KCR Station B/T...
About the new route to University, how about make 272P full day and extend from Diamond Hill to Lam Tin???
I think this move will just make the pax change at other station rather than Kowloon Tong which could help to reduce the interchange pax at Kowloon Tong which maybe a good idea... But would KCR be happy about it as it would reduce the number of long distance traveller to Lo Wo from Kowloon Tong or further South??? |
|
|
|
|
[ref=414274]SSBT[/ref] 在 2005-11-6 09:59 PM 發表:
其實冇乜必要咁改啦…
如果乘客真係拉住行李,
咁搭巴士都唔方便啦~
況且巴士又要左兜右兜,
個總站響火車站又點?
70X總站夠係響火車站隔離囉…
不過響北區兜一頭半個鐘先上到公路,
俾係搭唔搭 ...
文中已提及,行車時間要與地鐵差不多,好似70x咁,
有人搭既,咪係我囉,上左車訓醒幾次都未到觀塘,除非我好眼訓,
我一年都會搭一次咁多既~
我就咁睇,你比部特低地台黎行下,拉部行李車既難度點會低d既~
況且轉乘九龍塘地鐵,又上,又落,又要出入多次閘,去到地鐵站
又要返回地面,我試得多,好在我仲後生,頂得住~
至於巴士左兜右兜呢,以九記既思維不足為奇啦,不過呢個係咪對九記
同乘客都雙贏呢,我覺得就未必.如果有人整條咁既村巴線出黎
(合法/非法?),我諗我都會支持的, 起碼我從user角度睇,o岩用囉 .#8)
過境巴,去皇崗,深圳地鐵未通,接駁廣深鐵路,坐的士吧~
[ Last edited by Dolphin on 2005-11-6 at 22:28 ] |
|
|
|
|
[ref=414279]wally[/ref] 在 2005-11-6 10:05 PM 發表:
Does Tai Wo B/T have space to cope with 74X??? A route with so many buses???
About 80, no problem, just make it go via Tai Wai KCR Station B/T...
About the new route to University, how about make 272P full day and extend from Diamond Hill to Lam Tin???
I think this move will just make the pax change at other station rather than Kowloon Tong which could help to reduce the interchange pax at Kowloon Tong which maybe a good idea... But would KCR be happy about it as it would reduce the number of long distance traveller to Lo Wo from Kowloon Tong or further South???
Just my fantasy, how about making Rt.74x passing Tai Po Market terminus? instead of moving it to Tai Wo? |
|
|
|
|
Well... The problem is if you extend to Tai Po Market, then you wont be able to serve Tai Po Centre area unless you go to Tai Po Centre streight after Tolo Highway, but that would make Tai Po Market people think its a waste of time, or if you make them go via Tai Po KCR Station then market and centre, people in centre will think its a waste of time too... So its hard to balance since passenger from both area are important to support this route... And KMB wont benefit much from extending so I believe the chance is not so high for those Tai Po X routes to extend to Tai Po Station B/T... |
|
|
|
|
[ref=414232]Dolphin[/ref] 在 2005-11-6 09:26 PM 發表:
例如, Rt.74x改以太和為終站, Rt.80站位與大圍站拉近?
點解你唔搭89路線係新城市廣場落車,
之後步行往沙田東鐵站搭九廣東鐵北上
往羅湖??
始終搭89路線去沙田果邊轉車又快又平,
唔好唔記得80路線係非繁忙時間又要經
顯徑,隆亨仲晒時間. |
|
遊過浪漫時代 新世紀中蓋上塵埃
|
|
|
[ref=414608]3AD60[/ref] 在 2005-11-7 08:09 AM 發表:
點解你唔搭89路線係新城市廣場落車,
之後步行往沙田東鐵站搭九廣東鐵北上
往羅湖??
始終搭89路線去沙田果邊轉車又快又平,
唔好唔記得80路線係非繁忙時間又要經
顯徑,隆亨仲晒時間.
又或者Rt.89x都得. 下次我會實踐下.
不過我覺得, 比較理想係在大埔駁到腳落觀塘,
縮短左東鐵往返羅湖坐既車程, 企既時間少左. 時間上
亦可能比轉地鐵更快~ |
|
|
|
|
我的意见:
最理想是有類似在上水轉279x往青衣的模式,另一個本人認為既能接駁巴士較快速地往返觀塘區又能縮短乘搭東鐵往返羅湖車程的方法是乘277x到粉嶺名都下車走到粉嶺火車站轉東鐵往羅湖,往觀塘時則穿過粉嶺名都天橋到對面祥華邨的車站轉乘277x。所用的車資亦僅比279x多五毫。 |
|
|
|
|
[ref=414694]kj9021[/ref] 在 2005-11-7 12:57 PM 發表:
最理想是有類似在上水轉279x往青衣的模式,另一個本人認為既能接駁巴士較快速地往返觀塘區又能縮短乘搭東鐵往返羅湖車程的方法是乘277x到粉嶺名都下車走到粉嶺火車站轉東鐵往羅湖,往觀塘時則穿過粉嶺名都天橋到對 ...
呢個我又可以試下. Thanks for your advice. |
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|