本帖最後由 S3BL100 於 2017-3-28 12:07 編輯
leeallen 發表於 2017-3-28 00:44
定時每日同一定點見同一班車當然差唔多見親都拖, 上網又將放大, 咁當然想當然成日拖
如果佢地每日都唔同時 ...
Hmm... autohypnosis?interesting
班次問題其他版友已解釋，唔再多講
即係咁，全世界唔係圍住順利邨轉，而家彩雲、順安、順天樂見 23 26M 合併，改善彩雲、順天往觀塘的服務，
順理成章 23 26M 合併後加班，逆時針圈維持兩條線但減班，公平分配資源，根本係理所當然，對大家都公平
而唔應該係順利攬住兩條逆時針尾站線，連減班都唔俾，阻礙其他區提昇服務
符女士的咀臉，其他區係會銘記於心的
nickk 發表於 2017-3-27 22:53
如果九巴肯用2A同28加轉乘優惠，代替23M在樂華既接駁線地位的話，取消23M絕對不成問題。
...
28西行方向不經啟業邨，好難做到BBI
反而搵2A一條做BBI已經足夠。
HR1377 發表於 2017-3-28 08:19
到時重組未必郁216M，始終216M淨係做油塘、藍田一帶。
同埋 閣下建議23B行車路線只須增設13X八達通雙向 ...
13X 深入到四順？深入到 megabox？
你咁做等同將半條 28B 的乘客倒落海…
反正舊年年中出過修訂版 23 26M 合併建議果陣，開多班 26B 順利落九龍灣，
23B 就係以此作藍本，方便四順落九龍灣商貿區，又維持順利有兩條逆時針線，仲可以食埋半條 28B，代大半條 23M
剩返果半條 28B，就拎去做彩福 - 牛頭角道 - 觀塘巿中心 - 聯合醫院 - 安達，
點睇都正常過你拎 16M 去改，整出觀塘第三條無人坐全程的嘔心 U 形線
16M 可以再睇下點同 14B 14H 甚至 216M 整合
同埋雖然運吉無招標過安達觀塘線，但無人講過開呢條線會 ban。
反而更大問題係區內短途線收得太平無肉食，又唔係招標，九巴無誘因倒新資源落去做
呢個先係只能考慮現有路線重組去做安達 - 觀塘巿中心/協和街的真正原因，但根本可以開新編號，唔一定要用現有路線直接拉上去
本帖最後由 HR1377 於 2017-3-28 12:42 編輯
S3BL100 發表於 2017-3-28 12:20
13X 深入到四順？深入到 megabox？
你咁做等同將半條 28B 的乘客倒落海…
如果28B由彩福開，啟晴、德朗仲有什麼車來往觀塘市中心和聯合醫院？
HR1377 發表於 2017-3-28 12:35
如果28B由彩福開，啟晴、德朗仲有什麼車來往觀塘市中心和聯合醫院？
見上文，咪就係用 23B 食左呢半條 28B 囉
冇查過區議會傾成點 純發問
23 23M 26M 29M有冇機會一齊重組？一條觀彩來回行順利邨道 另一條來回行利安道 好似290 290A走線咁
kay 發表於 2017-3-28 06:59
依家有ETA，比以前方便左睇聯合班次成效
好似尋晚9點幾十點開住黎望23/23M，個段時間都係聯合0-20分1班
反而我會諗其實谷大26M做係唔係真係咁好
車程長但客量好大機會分兩段兼唔平衡
日後客量再增加要放比較多既車先可以加到載客量
計落其實唔太著數
kay 發表於 2017-3-28 06:59
依家有ETA，比以前方便左睇聯合班次成效
好似尋晚9點幾十點開住黎望23/23M，個段時間都係聯合0-20分1班
20分鐘時段路面暢通, 要真.聯合唔難, 點解做唔到? 可能關乘客事掛 :L
本帖最後由 leeallen 於 2017-3-29 07:16 編輯
Some thoughts I really need to say.
Some random dude just like to judge others.It's not the 1st time and I bet it'd not the last.
I donno who the heck he think he is.
Criticizing people for being exercise the right as a local residents.
It's big hell difference fm providing insightful views than accusing someone's position.
Giving out alternatives is far more better than smashing someone because of their location.
Has any loyalist criticized a democrat for being a democrat or vice versa?Nay.
Then what's wrong for any local residents searching for their best interests?
When does it being view as blocking others?Pathetic idea!
It is also freaking funny that nonsense fairness is being forcefully shoved down others' throat.
The gauge for fairness is just too subjective.Reality is services are not identical for every damn
communites, not even with the similar size.So why even bother mention it?
Cut me some slack, won't you?
Personal hatred toward anyone have nothing to do with us.Stop redirecting.
Don't be a jerk, man.Go and get them as you will.
One thing is for sure, those people have the ability making changes aint want no part of
this controversy.With no light being seen in the tunnel, they simply avoid it.For those
continuing B-Sting craps over copper wire or glass tube, nothing will be done.In the same
time, I aint gonna tit-for-tat for those craps.I won't.Just not worth it.
10598C 發表於 2017-3-28 18:27
冇查過區議會傾成點 純發問
23 23M 26M 29M有冇機會一齊重組？一條觀彩來回行順利邨道 另一條來回行利安道...
要重組, 我諗以下方案最可行
(1) 26M 來回改行順利邨道, 23/23M 落山入多次順天, 29M 照舊
(2) 26M 改上安達臣, 23/23M 落山入多次順天, 29M 照舊
(3) 等市中心重建後 26M+29M 合併, 總站放新觀塘總站, 23/23M 照舊