回復 30# 的帖子
如果係要咁改倒不如唔好改好過 原帖由 AD18 於 2008-12-14 10:41 AM 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
如果係要咁改
倒不如唔好改好過
Well, sice the biggest problem of 70K for the service between SHS to LWH is expensive and the frequency is low, it is better to make a cheaper and faster service may make the line can have a more frequent frequency by the same amount of buses.
Which may compete with the minibuses 原帖由 hkstudent 於 2008-12-14 14:59 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Well, sice the biggest problem of 70K for the service between SHS to LWH is expensive and the frequency is low, it is better to make a cheaper and faster service may make the line can have a more frequent frequency by the same amount of buses.
Which may compete with the minibuses
其實就算比你加班 / 加車都無乜用
萬一上水龍琛路一帶 , 甚至其他路段有道路工程既話
一樣係無用 原帖由 AD18 於 2008-12-15 08:38 PM 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
其實就算比你加班 / 加車都無乜用
萬一上水龍琛路一帶 , 甚至其他路段有道路工程既話
一樣係無用 [/quote
So, do you think that is there any other options?:L
Don't tell me that to follow the route of 70X. 原帖由 hkstudent 於 2008-12-15 22:04 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
原帖由 AD18 於 2008-12-15 08:38 PM 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
其實就算比你加班 / 加車都無乜用
萬一上水龍琛路一帶 , 甚至其他路段有道路工程既話
一樣係無用
以不變應萬變:victory: 原帖由 AD18 於 2008-12-15 10:10 PM 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
以不變應萬變:victory:
Well , the old line and the new line both use the Lung Sum Road.
There is no difference between them in that place.
So, could you please give me some suggestion on the route in SHS town? 原帖由 hkstudent 於 2008-12-15 22:21 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Well , the old line and the new line both use the Lung Sum Road.
There is no difference between them in that place.
So, could you please give me some suggestion on the route in SHS town?
其實你呢個改動一開始已經係有問題
我之前都講左
係呢個階段暫時最好係以不變應萬變 70K入清河係回應地區訴求的結果。
議員成日都話要爭取小巴線由清河去聯和墟，
運輸署為協調地區及節省資源，最簡單方法係將70K改入清河總站出，
完全唔覺問題好大，仲可以即時解決地區的訴求。
如果要招標條小巴線，又要等下年標書刋憲投標，又唔知有無人入標，
中標者又唔知幾耐先安排到車輛開線，調條70K入去就可以最快解決問題。
如果要怪罪，只有怪議員點解有咁樣咁強烈的訴求，一強烈就令運輸署出此下策。 原帖由 KC3555 於 2008-12-16 23:51 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
70K入清河係回應地區訴求的結果。
議員成日都話要爭取小巴線由清河去聯和墟，
運輸署為協調地區及節省資源，最簡單方法係將70K改入清河總站出，
完全唔覺問題好大，仲可以即時解決地區的訴求。
如果要招標條小巴線，又要等下 ...
咁區議員都係為居民爭取姐 ..
反正華明一帶都有 278x 做「特快」,
我唔見得樓主既建議係好囉 .. 原帖由 KC3555 於 2008-12-16 11:51 PM 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
70K入清河係回應地區訴求的結果。
議員成日都話要爭取小巴線由清河去聯和墟，
運輸署為協調地區及節省資源，最簡單方法係將70K改入清河總站出，
完全唔覺問題好大，仲可以即時解決地區的訴求。
如果要招標條小巴線，又要等下 ...
無辦法,70K的作用是要「服務全北區」,所以經少一個都唔夠。
其實要78K兜入去會更好:L
每日係家望過去都見到得少過5個人上車
P.S. 273B改道後成為全北區最短的線 (每公里1元),好貴呀:@
仲要serve得個總站,不知所謂