原帖由 orange 於 2009-2-14 05:02 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
當然係有關係
機場巴士載既唔單係人,仲有行李,所以當時架Olympian
只可坐60人左右
現今兩軸巴士歐洲容許係18噸,香港係16噸,一架E400平均
可以坐70-80位(未計企位),但架車係無冷氣機,如果香港要用
E400,七除八扣應 ...
What GU657 is talking about is those ex-London Airbus Olympians are only allowed to have 60 seats fitted - with no standing passengers by the way - after they got the luggage racks removed when they came off the Airbus services to get themselves within the 18 tonnes limited.
For a like for like specification, a E400 is still around 0.5 tonnes heavier than a Volvo Olympian of similar size. Under the air-cond unit (along with the air ducts and other fittings) are much much lighter, I am seriously skeptic that the E400 will get 70 seats - even getting to the lower 60s will be a push.
原帖由 kmb_gu657 於 2009-2-14 13:34 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
60 seats on those Olympians are only achieved by removing the luggage rack. When new, they only have 52 seats(43+9).
香港10.6.米o既曲梯雙層冷馬只有51+27= 78 個座位
如果<10.6米o既巴士仲要裝埋直梯
座位數量真係少得不能想像
原帖由 hksf 於 2009-2-14 22:08 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
香港10.6.米o既曲梯雙層冷馬只有51+27= 78 個座位
如果<10.6米o既巴士仲要裝埋直梯
座位數量真係少得不能想像
架車本身都唔夠重載咁多人啦…:victory:
原帖由 NV58 於 2009-2-14 21:30 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
What GU657 is talking about is those ex-London Airbus Olympians are only allowed to have 60 seats fitted - with no standing passengers by the way - after they got the luggage racks removed when they ...
個批車而家既內籠係點?!
空個大水塘?
原帖由 FA9671 於 2009-2-14 12:08 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
正如樓上所說，如果它是大量購入的話，即使要改底盤設計，也一點都不成問題
橫豎未來數年都有為數不少的ADS開始退役........
還是你想說的是技術問題?? ...
其實都有先例, 因為Leyland做唔到雙門短蘭, 所以有單都做唔到九巴生意, 益晒Dennis
原帖由 ksmbh 於 2009-2-14 16:58 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
個批車而家既內籠係點?!
空個大水塘?
From my memory, they just leave the space alone for buggies and wheelchairs - afterall, they have a lift at the front door for that.
原帖由 tomchen 於 2009-2-14 16:18 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
黎到時好似有 79 座，超重呢個問題應該同運輸署傾過，
所以只有運架車黎試路...
http://www.alexander-dennis.com/brochure_downloads/spec_sheets/final_spec_sheets/enviro_400_body.pdf
根據 Alexander- dennis 的 spec sheet...
Envrio 400 有 3 種玩法~
1. Trident 10.1m (2 door)
Lower Saloon: 24 + wheelchair OR 27 inc. 1 tip-up
Upper Saloon: 43
= 67 + wheelchair OR 70 inc. 1 tip-up
2. Trident 10.8m (2 door)
Lower Saloon: 28 + wheelchair OR 31 inc. 1 tip-up
Upper Saloon: 47
= 75 + wheelchair OR 78 inc. 1 tip-up
3. Trident 10.8m (1 door)
Lower Saloon: 32 + wheelchair OR 33 inc. 1 tip-up
Upper Saloon: 47
= 79 + wheelchair OR 80 inc. 1 tip-up
如果係 79 人的話應是 3. Trident 10.8m (1 door)
原帖由 S3N92 於 2009-2-13 22:36 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
無深度係你
enviro 400唔係是必指trident底盤...可以係B9配400
人地問緊個底盤...你就走去答ADL解乜
deleted
[ 本帖最後由 ME 於 2009-2-15 20:47 編輯 ]
原帖由 ronaldlau 於 2009-2-15 12:55 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
http://www.alexander-dennis.com/brochure_downloads/spec_sheets/final_spec_sheets/enviro_400_body.pdf
根據 Alexander- dennis 的 spec sheet...
Envrio 400 有 3 種玩法~
1. Trident 10.1m (2 door)
Lo ...
但以香港公共交通環境
10.1m單門及10.8m雙門會係較適合選擇