原帖由 orange 於 2009-7-1 23:07 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Optare無blacklist九巴,只係當年間廠要趕訂單先無運架
雙層巴士俾九巴試,跟住之後無再跟進
我講的係剛剛相反…。
原帖由 petcity 於 2009-7-1 22:57 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif但坦白講，我又冇話點聽過人講MAN行182，除左打風所以有少少懷疑至於Solo同Dart比，各有各好處，但究竟日後會點，冇人知雖然E200Dart係ADL出品，好似有優勢，但講真，買車不外乎最好平靚正，所以，只好講，架車最Top，但售價天文數字 ...
印像中MPD係平過相若SIZE既SOLO.
原帖由 aa2_dart 於 2009-7-1 02:07 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
不過你講到SOLO , um.... 比較personal咁講 , first , 佢比起Dart應該冇咁襟玩同埋冇咁多線完全啱行 , 你試下用十米長既solo日日行211頂閘上山 , 實好快死www.hkitalk.net: q1
No, as I said before, the requirement for a 10m single decker for KMB is pretty much gone, since many of the single deck service and make do with something a little bigger (and hence the ASBs). One thing you shall be aware of is the service that you keep bringing up, the 211, is predominately operated with the ex-NWFB 10.7m AAs.
That brings us to the other services which really need buses small than a 10m AA, and on that ground it's not going to do E200Dart a lot of favour, because for that segment of the market, the Solo is actually outselling the Dart/E200Dart of similar size. More importantly, over the last 11 years the Solo have prove itself just as reliable, and, being lighter, cheaper to run as well. On these basis alone, I will be very surprise if KMB do not, if Optare offers them a competitive bid, at least have a good look on the type.
Going back to what I said before, I don't think we will see KMB coming back to buy shedloads of 10m single deckers in short/medium term. My bet will be a batch of up to 30 smaller buses like a 8.9m or 9.3m E200Dart or eqv to be brought in to replace some AAs and the remaining AMs.
數下先
60 AVBW
40 B7RLE + MCV 車身
5x ATEU
18 ASU
最期待 係 Scania 隻層隻車身...
唔知會用邊隻呢
當年話葡萄牙果隻車身已經冇用
開講又講 九巴同 Volgren 關係而家係點?
用Volgren 都好:loveliness:
之前講既E400
好似又冇曬聲氣
唔通真係大單層當細雙層用 ?
[ 本帖最後由 EF107 於 2009-7-2 21:24 編輯 ]
原帖由 EF107 於 2009-7-2 11:16 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
40 B7TL + MCV 車身
係B7RLE唔係B7TL
原帖由 EF107 於 2009-7-2 11:16 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
之前講既E400
$ |: B7 O1 U! i- N' a: K好似又冇曬聲氣hkitalk.netw1 q0 d7 u( y, r
$ v" H4 |/ z; t" M' F7 {- O
唔通真係大單層當細雙層用 ?
年尾嘛，仲有大半年慢慢等o下都未遲。
原帖由 EF107 於 2009-7-2 11:16 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
數下先
60 AVBW
40 B7RLE + MCV 車身
5x ATEU
18 ASU
最期待 係 Scania 隻層隻車身...
唔知會用邊隻呢
當年話葡萄牙果隻車身已經冇用
開講又講 九巴同 Volgren 關係而家係點?
用Volgren 都好:loveliness:
之前 ...
其實 E500 車身又係唔係可以上起 Scania 度呢 ?
如果冇用葡國車身, E500 又可以的話, 都有好大機會 ~
以 B9TL 個邊就已經睇到 ~
原帖由 S3BL470@98A 於 2009-7-3 11:52 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
現在九巴E500及Volvo B9TL 是不是全數都是12米巴士?:o
無錯。 http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v337/1601/wink.gif
原帖由 EF107 於 2009-7-2 11:16 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
數下先
60 AVBW
40 B7RLE + MCV 車身
5x ATEU
18 ASU
最期待 係 Scania 隻層隻車身...
唔知會用邊隻呢
當年話葡萄牙果隻車身已經冇用
開講又講 九巴同 Volgren 關係而家係點?
用Volgren 都好:loveliness:
之前 ...
無左英國Caetano條product line姐
原廠葡萄牙仲係度架嘛，而且Dubai批SCANIA撻左訂，ｄ件，原料Caetano都要搵出路喇;P