GY8271@93A
發表於 2009-11-23 21:58
原帖由 da54 於 2009-11-23 16:05 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
所有圖片,未得本人許可,嚴禁轉載,違者必究。
126934
126935
126936
126937
126938
126939
126940
所有圖片,未得本人許可,嚴禁轉載,違者必究。
126941
126942
126943
126944
126945
126946
126947
所有圖片 ...
城巴右邊太平門黑色部分好正!!! 同九巴批2009既ATEU一樣:D
FY3401
發表於 2009-11-23 22:00
原帖由 kkkwok 於 2009-11-23 09:51 PM 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
部車14噸都唔夠
載埋人都應該無2噸喇~...
照計就應該唔超16噸2軸既問題
不過部車應該偷得好輕就真....
之前仲諗佢會超16噸運吉既限制
ASC都過16噸
港版E400一定係過20噸
GTI
發表於 2009-11-23 22:03
哼咁你就比較吓亞記與溪坦奴的技術水準啦!
NWFB2075
發表於 2009-11-23 22:07
原帖由 dennisung 於 2009-11-23 18:23 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
其實要諗下兩軸車比三軸車有乜野好處?
除外過隧道時俾少d錢
仲有無其他?
睇見新城批11.3米死度爛度都要唧到個輪椅位出來
就已經帶出到2軸車於排列設施時既靈活性...
AP38
發表於 2009-11-23 22:33
原帖由 FY3401 於 2009-11-23 20:27 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
:L D馬力... ...
好細,340匹就不多了:o
而家d豬都係 285 匹 , 膠躉都係 305 匹:L
差o個 20 匹都差唔遠姐
況且仲有d係for冷氣:L
on11358
發表於 2009-11-23 22:38
原帖由 kkkwok 於 2009-11-23 21:51 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
部車14噸都唔夠
載埋人都應該無2噸喇~...
照計就應該唔超16噸2軸既問題
不過部車應該偷得好輕就真....
之前仲諗佢會超16噸運吉既限制
ASC淨重11.648噸,行車證準許載16.5噸,最多可以載81人,
11648+(82X每人重量KG)=16500,即係平均每人重60KG左右,
代返入呢部車既資料
13660KG+(89X60KG)=19000KG
超出法例准許差唔多20%,出事起上黎責任問題好難搞。
[ 本帖最後由 on11358 於 2009-11-23 22:58 編輯 ]
FT7052
發表於 2009-11-23 22:40
原帖由 FY3401 於 2009-11-23 10:00 PM 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
ASC都過16噸
港版E400一定係過20噸
睇左貼o係車頭果張紙先講野好唔好...
~~Knysna~~
發表於 2009-11-24 01:21
原帖由 FT7052 於 2009-11-23 22:40 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
睇左貼o係車頭果張紙先講野好唔好...
人地講緊載滿客後噸數
cn2661_2d32
發表於 2009-11-24 02:42
我反而覺得車尾線條順眼過E500
個車尾燈殼幾有殺氣.同埋條銀色bar落得幾靚
尾的車頂位線條靚左.
車頭就未見到.不過照計頭幅的上層點都係靚仔過E500.
車咀如果真係有排LED應該會幾靚.
[ 本帖最後由 cn2661_2d32 於 2009-11-24 02:46 編輯 ]
NV58
發表於 2009-11-24 03:09
原帖由 nwfb1601 於 2009-11-23 11:27 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/viewthread.php?tid=436144&page=1#pid1666470
連結中0既回文話部車係長 10.1 米。 http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v337/1601/rolleyes.gif
Well, I said that, but that was judging from how the window bays were and I didn't account (or note) that the engine compartment and rear overhang is quite a bit longer than a normal E400 (which has a smaller engine, and hence a shorter rear overhang). Put it into perspective, this is what a 10.1m E400 should look like, and you can really see how much shorter the rear overhang is:
http://www.tinywong.talktalk.net/mln_TE715_090406b.jpg
It is interesting to compare this to a E400 bodied 2-axle B9TL, which also has a big engine compartment, which is a tiny little bit shorter. That said, it's still shorter than the a E400 Scania.
FY3401: How much more power do you want? The E400 is 10% lighterthan a E500 with only 20bhp short. I won't call that thing underpowered, not even slightly.