S3BL470@98A
發表於 2009-11-25 19:36
Sorry, DEL...
[ 本帖最後由 S3BL470@98A 於 2009-11-25 19:39 編輯 ]
Tridentlam
發表於 2009-11-25 21:01
今日去過車場外, 發覺佢下層最尾排只有 4 個座位 (如果冇睇錯 ge 話)
果 4 個座位之間都有黑色 90 度扶手分隔
近太平門果邊少左個位, 因為凸左舊野出黎 for 個水箱散熱位
93A_S3_6:30am
發表於 2009-11-25 22:04
原帖由 Tridentlam 於 2009-11-25 21:01 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
今日去過車場外, 發覺佢下層最尾排只有 4 個座位 (如果冇睇錯 ge 話)
果 4 個座位之間都有黑色 90 度扶手分隔
近太平門果邊少左個位, 因為凸左舊野出黎 for 個水箱散熱位 ...
thx~原來如此,
唔怪之得計極都計唔到下層點得出23個位啦~:)
咁下層應該係,
導航位x3個+左邊兩人位x3排+右邊兩人位x5排+最尾排x4個=23:D
da54
發表於 2009-11-26 00:23
原帖由 河灣西 於 2009-11-24 10:41 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
但係,呢篇文係我歷年來係本壇同友壇睇過最多廢問,
唔爬文、冇眼睇...好多廢問,
簡直 ...
河兄,或者佢地從未見過 E400,太過興奮所以急住開文連文都費時爬掛..... ;P
廢問還好,起碼都係巴迷自己覺得煩....
最弊係有人出去搞搞震,真係阻住做正經生意的人,做壞巴迷個朵..... :@
rayng
發表於 2009-11-26 01:22
車尾有點怪怪.......會吾會容易反車呢
orange
發表於 2009-11-26 01:24
原帖由 rayng 於 2009-11-26 01:22 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
車尾有點怪怪.......會吾會容易反車呢
車尾怪同易翻車有無關係?如果係既英國車咪成日發生意外?!
rayng
發表於 2009-11-26 01:26
原帖由 orange 於 2009-11-26 01:24 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
車尾怪同易翻車有無關係?如果係既英國車咪成日發生意外?!
原來係禁既........是我自己見識太小
NV58
發表於 2009-11-26 04:27
原帖由 a396 於 2009-11-25 11:14 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
其實我好期望兩軸 B9TL 同 Scania N230UD
o既出現, 當然都要等 E400 試車成功先講.
I wouldn't hold my breathe if I were you. Both are typically 500kg heavier than a (ok, the shorter 10.1m version) E400 - the latest London-spec E400 weighs less then 11,600kg empty, and the Scania weighs 12,100kg. Even the latest B9TLs in London - supposed to be lightened, are slightly heavier than the Scania. That extra weight will take a penalty of 9 people in capacity, put it this way. The flip side is this HK version of the E400 has a bigger engine, and being longer as well, should be heavier if it was built to the same body spec to the UK 10.1m version, but I don't think it would close the gap much.
Taking the weight issue aside, the Scania's chance is slim, simply because I can't see ADL would offer the bodywork on it for competition reason, and Optare is unlikely to make it here as it has no customer base here, and then the Omnicity version is simply more expensive (supposedly).
For the Volvo, unless Wrightbus somehow find a way to build all the extra bits (air-cond and so on) without taking up as much weight, or simply find ways to reduce the weight further, it is not likely we'll see the 2-axle Volvo/Wright combination either.
dennischung545
發表於 2009-11-26 08:14
唔知城記會唔會好似新E500一樣行102操車呢?
S3BL470@98A
發表於 2009-11-27 00:05
原帖由 yunghin2004 於 2009-11-23 19:29 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
估唔到今次KMB都會用番Hanover喎...:Q
小弟覺得Gorba好睇啲
對,我都是這樣說。
喜歡 Gorba 多過 Hanover 。