CTB & KMB Enviro400 arrived HK
[複製鏈接]
|
原帖由 da54 於 2009-11-23 16:05 發表 
所有圖片,未得本人許可,嚴禁轉載,違者必究。
126934
126935
126936
126937
126938
126939
126940
所有圖片,未得本人許可,嚴禁轉載,違者必究。
126941
126942
126943
126944
126945
126946
126947
所有圖片 ...
城巴右邊太平門黑色部分好正!!! 同九巴批2009既ATEU一樣 |
|
ASU1 . 軒仔 - 萬歲!!
|
|
|
原帖由 kkkwok 於 2009-11-23 09:51 PM 發表 
部車14噸都唔夠
載埋人都應該無2噸喇~...
照計就應該唔超16噸2軸既問題
不過部車應該偷得好輕就真....
之前仲諗佢會超16噸運吉既限制
ASC都過16噸
港版E400一定係過20噸 |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 dennisung 於 2009-11-23 18:23 發表 
其實要諗下兩軸車比三軸車有乜野好處?
除外過隧道時俾少d錢
仲有無其他?
睇見新城批11.3米死度爛度都要唧到個輪椅位出來
就已經帶出到2軸車於排列設施時既靈活性... |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 kkkwok 於 2009-11-23 21:51 發表 
部車14噸都唔夠
載埋人都應該無2噸喇~...
照計就應該唔超16噸2軸既問題
不過部車應該偷得好輕就真....
之前仲諗佢會超16噸運吉既限制
ASC淨重11.648噸,行車證準許載16.5噸,最多可以載81人,
11648+(82X每人重量KG)=16500,即係平均每人重60KG左右,
代返入呢部車既資料
13660KG+(89X60KG)=19000KG
超出法例准許差唔多20%,出事起上黎責任問題好難搞。
[ 本帖最後由 on11358 於 2009-11-23 22:58 編輯 ] |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 FY3401 於 2009-11-23 10:00 PM 發表 
ASC都過16噸
港版E400一定係過20噸
睇左貼o係車頭果張紙先講野好唔好... |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 FT7052 於 2009-11-23 22:40 發表 
睇左貼o係車頭果張紙先講野好唔好...
人地講緊載滿客後噸數 |
|
|
|
|
我反而覺得車尾線條順眼過E500
個車尾燈殼幾有殺氣.同埋條銀色bar落得幾靚
尾的車頂位線條靚左.
車頭就未見到.不過照計頭幅的上層點都係靚仔過E500.
車咀如果真係有排LED應該會幾靚.
[ 本帖最後由 cn2661_2d32 於 2009-11-24 02:46 編輯 ] |
|
|
|
|
Well, I said that, but that was judging from how the window bays were and I didn't account (or note) that the engine compartment and rear overhang is quite a bit longer than a normal E400 (which has a smaller engine, and hence a shorter rear overhang). Put it into perspective, this is what a 10.1m E400 should look like, and you can really see how much shorter the rear overhang is:

It is interesting to compare this to a E400 bodied 2-axle B9TL, which also has a big engine compartment, which is a tiny little bit shorter. That said, it's still shorter than the a E400 Scania.
FY3401: How much more power do you want? The E400 is 10% lighter than a E500 with only 20bhp short. I won't call that thing underpowered, not even slightly. |
|
Tinyl Bus Photography - FB Group
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|