CTB & KMB Enviro400 arrived HK
[複製鏈接]
|
Sorry, DEL...
[ 本帖最後由 S3BL470@98A 於 2009-11-25 19:39 編輯 ] |
|
簽名被屏蔽
|
|
|
今日去過車場外, 發覺佢下層最尾排只有 4 個座位 (如果冇睇錯 ge 話)
果 4 個座位之間都有黑色 90 度扶手分隔
近太平門果邊少左個位, 因為凸左舊野出黎 for 個水箱散熱位 |
|
|
|
|
|
獨愛☆OLYMPIANS~powered by~CUMMINS
|
|
|
原帖由 rayng 於 2009-11-26 01:22 發表 
車尾有點怪怪.......會吾會容易反車呢
車尾怪同易翻車有無關係?如果係既英國車咪成日發生意外?! |
|
益童學校,全民教育
|
|
|
原帖由 orange 於 2009-11-26 01:24 發表 
車尾怪同易翻車有無關係?如果係既英國車咪成日發生意外?!
原來係禁既........是我自己見識太小 |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 a396 於 2009-11-25 11:14 發表 
其實我好期望兩軸 B9TL 同 Scania N230UD
o既出現, 當然都要等 E400 試車成功先講.
I wouldn't hold my breathe if I were you. Both are typically 500kg heavier than a (ok, the shorter 10.1m version) E400 - the latest London-spec E400 weighs less then 11,600kg empty, and the Scania weighs 12,100kg. Even the latest B9TLs in London - supposed to be lightened, are slightly heavier than the Scania. That extra weight will take a penalty of 9 people in capacity, put it this way. The flip side is this HK version of the E400 has a bigger engine, and being longer as well, should be heavier if it was built to the same body spec to the UK 10.1m version, but I don't think it would close the gap much.
Taking the weight issue aside, the Scania's chance is slim, simply because I can't see ADL would offer the bodywork on it for competition reason, and Optare is unlikely to make it here as it has no customer base here, and then the Omnicity version is simply more expensive (supposedly).
For the Volvo, unless Wrightbus somehow find a way to build all the extra bits (air-cond and so on) without taking up as much weight, or simply find ways to reduce the weight further, it is not likely we'll see the 2-axle Volvo/Wright combination either. |
|
Tinyl Bus Photography - FB Group
|
|
|
原帖由 yunghin2004 於 2009-11-23 19:29 發表 
估唔到今次KMB都會用番Hanover喎...
小弟覺得Gorba好睇啲
對,我都是這樣說。
喜歡 Gorba 多過 Hanover 。 |
|
簽名被屏蔽
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|