原帖由 VA54-HN8897 於 2010-3-8 21:49 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
我話分分鐘衰過撞到人，加因撞到人都仲有得去查，司機解畫機會都多D，依家唔駛審都已經冇得賴，可以話查o既就只有查下司機個底之前有冇花，解畫都冇咩用，佢o係公司入面可以話都幾肯定冇好下場....所以我只係話分分鐘....:L ...
明白明白:L :L
不過佢呢單高危動作，無論有冇撞倒野都好，假如佢最好成功出得返去但被影左擺上網，畀管理層見倒一樣衰，更可況而家傑撻撻。除非......佢朝中有人，同阿sir拍兩下膊頭搞掂，如果唔係有排煩。
一浪接一浪，尚德果邊有個師傅炒完後仲要「誠實」同所有人講自己唔夠訓，真係o晒咀，亦都係兇多吉少，佢話避狗都仲有條出路有得解話，佢而家咁講真係迫自己埋牆！完全唔明白佢思想，做咩要咁坦白篤公司要佢追更出來，公司一句「符合運吉標準」已經可以博返佢呢句，佢真係傻左...
不知翠竹居民今次會否用法律途徑向新巴追討時間上的損失及太重型雙層車使用路面導致日後修路成本大增的損失?:lol
又不知道九巴會否向新巴追討211線客量流失導致車費收入大減的損失?
Why don't we focus the most important -He's already offence the laws which the junction Chuk Yuen Road / Wing Chuk Street are only available for car running within 10M as well
A bill of penalty of HKD 5000 can be charge by the government and 3 months jail for first attempt
The ROOT CAUSE for entering Tsui Chuk Garden is due to a faulty route selection , and misleaded to the roadsign which already prompt the car he is driving is not allowed to use this junctions as well , if he were noted by this roadsign , he will just continue to Chuk Yuen Terminus as well
原帖由 blueblue 於 2010-3-9 10:59 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
不知翠竹居民今次會否用法律途徑向新巴追討時間上的損失及太重型雙層車使用路面導致日後修路成本大增的損失?:lol
又不知道九巴會否向新巴追討211線客量流失導致車費收入大減的損失? ...
[ 本帖最後由 rlcw 於 2010-3-9 11:21 編輯 ]
原帖由 rlcw 於 2010-3-9 11:12 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Why don't we focus the most important -He's already offence the laws which the junction Chuk Yuen Road / Wing Chuk Street are only available for car running within 10M as well
A bill of penalty of ...
塊牌下面唔係有一句係「專利巴士除外/Except Franchised Buses」？
因為照你咁講，十米車或以上唔入得
咁九巴211既AA掛牌佬我諗一日都要坐幾廿次監...
雙門AA長度係十米以上喎
所以理論上今次新記超豪既司機應該無犯你所講既罪名
有錯請指。
Yes , you're really get something wrong , due to not enough knowledge on the said road condition therefor I've uploaded the picture right now for more clear picture on your mindset, kindly check please
The question you're raising I've reported to the government department (TD / HYD) and awaiting for their result , or "只許州官放火 不許百姓點燈" ?
If there's a roadsign (Except with permit / Except Franchised Buses) , it should be ok but at this junction we're now , NONE
Also , if there's a roadsign were mentioned over 10M is not permitted , which means the 10M is a limitation and this will be problem / dangerous on the said roads , which I think "Except Franchised Buses" will also involve problems otherwise no need to stand this notice , right ?
原帖由 ASV50 於 2010-3-9 11:30 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
塊牌下面唔係有一句係「專利巴士除外/Except Franchised Buses」？
因為照你咁講，十米車或以上唔入得
咁九巴211既AA掛牌佬我諗一日都要坐幾廿次監...
雙門AA長度係十米以上喎
所以理論上今次新記超豪既司機應該無犯 ...
[ 本帖最後由 rlcw 於 2010-3-9 11:54 編輯 ]
原帖由 rlcw 於 2010-3-9 11:34 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Yes , you're really get something wrong , due to not enough knowledge on the said road condition therefor I've uploaded the picture right now for more clear picture on your mindset, kindly check please 8 a. U# O) @; y8 N& Z/ {7 Q3 ~3 [/ p
The question you're raising I've reported to the government department (TD / HYD) and awaiting for their result , or "只許州官放火 不許百姓點燈" ?www.hkitalk.net" O& k" B! r! |8 N: G
If there's a roadsign (Except with permit / Except Franchised Buses) , it should be ok but at this junction we're now , NONE
; W5 h
Also , if there's a roadsign were mentioned over 10M is not permitted , which means the 10M is a limitation and this will be problem / dangerous on the said roads , which I think "Except Franchised Buses" will also involve problems otherwise no need to stand this notice , right ?
Calm down mate :)
Would it be because the Department only give permission to those ex-NWFB Darts over 10m, but not all franchised bus, so it choose not to set that roadsign "Except Franchised Buses"?Would it be possible to find those Darts and check if the permits are located on them, just like those ATEs getting permits of their over-width? I am also looking forward to the response from the Department, please share with us if you get it.
By the way, I cant find a roadsign on "Except with permit" in the TD website
(http://www.td.gov.hk/tc/road_safety/road_users_code/index/chapter_8_the_language_of_the_road/signs_giving_orders_/index.html). Does it exist?
According to the information I've and gazetted on the government by law , here is the information
Cap 374G , Page 66
http://www.legislation.gov.hk/blis_pdf.nsf/6799165D2FEE3FA94825755E0033E532/600E639993377DF6482575EE0077C931/$FILE/CAP_374G_e_b5.pdf
Clearly described the FIGURE No. 132 "No longer then > M cars allowed" can be use with FIGURE No. 403,404 and 405 , which talking the "except with permit"
"Except with permit" should use the same with FIGURE No. 132 if that's the case , Law is very strict to the wordings as well
Also , if there's the permit , it should well label on the bus/car instead .
原帖由 teddybus 於 2010-3-9 13:36 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Calm down mate :)
Would it be because the Department only give permission to those ex-NWFB Darts over 10m, but not all franchised bus, so it choose not to set that roadsign "Except Franchised Buses ...
[ 本帖最後由 rlcw 於 2010-3-9 14:12 編輯 ]
真係夠晒勁...我諗今次個新巴車長都凶多吉少........