rlcw
發表於 2010-3-8 12:14
Especially there're always said a security request he made the 180 turn , so who is ? any proven record ?
According to the live information and people I met , none of people mentioned such
Also , on the captioned area , there's a overhead camera which can clearly capture the whole bus how to come in by it's tail , all the information can be find out instead of someone always "said"
原帖由 teddybus 於 2010-3-8 12:03 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
but you still need to explain what lies are involved in this thread: what lie is it, who tell this lie, and etc...
and I cant understand how a noun "LIE" could be used as a connect word here.
[ 本帖最後由 rlcw 於 2010-3-8 12:20 編輯 ]
HV7025
發表於 2010-3-8 13:06
原帖由 kyc87d 於 2010-3-8 12:06 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
個人覺得,行緊竹園道都應該開始見到竹園巴總...
點解唔o係巴總求救~
---
有感而發的題外話︰
有時唔明,翠竹人成日會被「妖魔化」
作為居民團體,其實同政黨冇乜分別,都係要做「功績」出o黎俾人睇,整到個工作匯報
居民下年 ...
無可否認翠竹居民團體以往有D離譜既要求, 我都唔鍾意佢地 (不過我唔係住翠竹)
但我覺得總有人覺得所有由翠竹居民提議既事都係不合理的
好似話轉新車咁, 來來去去只有該團體拉過一條banner話爭取
我都無聽過居民對批雙門Dart唔滿意
但好似有唔少人以為係全體居民都要求九巴轉新車:L
teddybus
發表於 2010-3-8 13:12
原帖由 rlcw 於 2010-3-8 12:14 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Especially there're always said a security request he made the 180 turn , so who is ? any proven record ?
According to the live information and people I met , none of people mentioned such
Also , on the captioned area , there's a overhead camera which can clearly capture the whole bus how to come in by it's tail , all the information can be find out instead of someone always "said"
Well, perhaps the security guard didnt say that directly, but if he didnt allow the double decker to go straight, what else can the driver do other than making a 180 turn? Reversing it directly? I think it is a common sense for driver to make 180 turn other than reversing, particularly in such a narrow road.
The board members just quote somebody who may witness the incident and make a guess here, it is logical and reasonable, even though it may not be exactly what happened. Accusing people telling lies here is too serious.
teddybus
發表於 2010-3-8 13:14
原帖由 HV7025 於 2010-3-8 13:06 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
無可否認翠竹居民團體以往有D離譜既要求, 我都唔鍾意佢地 (不過我唔係住翠竹)
但我覺得總有人覺得所有由翠竹居民提議既事都係不合理的
好似話轉新車咁, 來來去去只有該團體拉過一條banner話爭取
我都無聽過居民對批 ...
咁又難怪,居民團體某程度係代表緊全體居民....
rlcw
發表於 2010-3-8 13:32
Maybe lies this word is over-react , I agreed and apologize
On the other hand , without any evidence , please help to advertise broad mate that not to say it's the security guard problem instead although we're the individual one
原帖由 teddybus 於 2010-3-8 13:12 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Well, perhaps the security guard didnt say that directly, but if he didnt allow the double decker to go straight, what else can the driver do other than making a 180 turn? Reversing it directly? I t ...
[ 本帖最後由 rlcw 於 2010-3-8 14:08 編輯 ]
NA4179x賢
發表於 2010-3-8 18:24
原帖由 s3n354 於 2010-3-8 01:02 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
不如講下班土皇帝既保安, 做咩叫部12米大巴士係更亭前調頭先啦, 有無腦架, 山頂回旋處點都易轉過呢個位:L
山頂位夠唔夠位轉架?
AA48@43A
發表於 2010-3-8 21:03
原帖由 rlcw 於 2010-3-8 12:14 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Especially there're always said a security request he made the 180 turn , so who is ? any proven record ?
According to the live information and people I met , none of people mentioned such
Also , o ...
保安就算冇叫佢在度調頭, 佢話你架車唔入得, 你自己諗計搞掂, 跟進咪又走返翠竹範圍食花生等睇戲...
個車長唔想在度頂先死啲車咪焗住調頭lor...
不過個保安冇報上台咩?? 如果管理公司有人肯幫手打交通俾車長求救, 返而有依家咁大獲....
AA48@43A
發表於 2010-3-8 21:14
原帖由 rlcw 於 2010-3-8 11:56 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Nope , I've checked this out very carefully this morning before any post being issue
FYI , , No.48 of signal
http://www.td.gov.hk/tc/road_safety/road_users_code/index/chapter_8_the_language_of_the_ ...
有趣的是我樓下都有一樣的路牌話唔俾長過11米的車入, 個巴士總站就塊牌後面, 在不過日日都有ATE做字軌....;P
唔知我果度係條私家路就唔同d...??
4056
發表於 2010-3-8 21:39
原帖由 VA54-HN8897 於 2010-3-8 10:17 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
都冇辦法,鬼叫個司機搞左個咁大o既獲出黎.....分分鐘仲衰過撞到人....:L
只能夠希望肇事司機去向會有好消息....==
咁又點都唔會衰過撞倒人。而家整爛野同阻路,頂多陪錢+罰錢+公司扣人工。撞倒人?隨時會撞死人,要食皇家飯+面對數百萬索償。2010年似乎巴士行緊衰運,初二三已經兩單大獲野,之後仲有呢d濕濕碎碎野,真係唔知發生甚麼事了。
我都完全唔明點解唔將部車泊埋一邊打上台求救,而誤信個保安,咁大架車唔係話調頭就調,保安講野事後可以唔認,又冇錄音,真係自己那屎上身,最唔明白係點解有後眼都撞石屎。尤其去到自己唔熟既地方更加唔可以亂來,佢幾時都要緊記自己唔係渣緊私家車,而係巴士,會有好多限制!好彩今次只係搞到封路,如果下次有誤闖有高度限制地方好似VA63咁批頂搞出人命,佢就成世水洗都唔清。相信新記都係大公司,員工有咩唔掂都係跟足程序就最穩妥,打工唔需要咁博,頂多咪返到廠簽返張野或者畀主任訓話幾句,唔駛而家咁大獲。
[ 本帖最後由 4056 於 2010-3-8 21:47 編輯 ]
VA54-HN8897
發表於 2010-3-8 21:49
原帖由 4056 於 2010-3-8 21:39 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
咁又點都唔會衰過撞倒人。而家整爛野同阻路,頂多陪錢+罰錢+公司扣人工。撞倒人?隨時會撞死人,要食皇家飯+面對數百萬索償。2010年似乎巴士行緊衰運,初二三已經兩單大獲野,之後仲有呢d濕濕碎碎野,真係唔知發生甚麼事了。
... 我話分分鐘衰過撞到人,加因撞到人都仲有得去查,司機解畫機會都多D,依家唔駛審都已經冇得賴,可以話查o既就只有查下司機個底之前有冇花,解畫都冇咩用,佢o係公司入面可以話都幾肯定冇好下場....所以我只係話分分鐘....:L
[ 本帖最後由 VA54-HN8897 於 2010-3-8 21:51 編輯 ]
頁:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
[9]
10
11