原帖由 Chi_Hang 於 2010-4-17 12:09 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXz6jyCQ-dg
MTM 又背黑窩，政府又把球推給 MTM， 真的玩死人！
唔好咁講, 呢D野, 你情我願GE,
又無人迫MTR一定要做呢單生意.
由頭到尾都係MTR自己縱個頭埋去,
就算比人玩, MTR自己都有責任,
起碼要檢討下, 去到外地, 自己有冇能力同各方勢力周旋.
原帖由 AVW56 於 2010-4-24 11:21 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
唔好咁講, 呢D野, 你情我願GE,
又無人迫MTR一定要做呢單生意.
由頭到尾都係MTR自己縱個頭埋去,
就算比人玩, MTR自己都有責任,
起碼要檢討下, 去到外地, 自己有冇能力同各方勢力周旋. ...
今次我認同
港鐵太過自大，低估左墨爾本營運鐵路嘅複雜性，
以為當地員工會好似香港人咁盡責，以為當地市民會好似香港人咁有公德，
以為當地政府好似香港咁重視基建，以為當地政府好似香港咁有錢
[ 本帖最後由 Kaix 於 2010-4-24 12:58 編輯 ]
原帖由 AVW56 於 2010-4-24 11:21 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
唔好咁講, 呢D野, 你情我願GE,
又無人迫MTR一定要做呢單生意.
由頭到尾都係MTR自己縱個頭埋去,
就算比人玩, MTR自己都有責任,
起碼要檢討下, 去到外地, 自己有冇能力同各方勢力周旋. ...
我估計 MTR 應該都不會貿然去投墨爾本鉄路來營運，她一定做了風險評估，只是可能評估的結果跟事實還是有一段距離。
先在我只有一句話給 MTR：前路難走，在墨爾本好好磨練自己，別丟香港人的臉。
To Kaix:
From your own point of view, is MTM service better than Connex, worse than Connex or no difference?(Somehow what I feel that those videos from Youtube cannot really let see the full picture of the service provided by the train company since those news programs are for the sick of reporting troubles of the train network.)
[ 本帖最後由 Chi_Hang 於 2010-4-24 19:28 編輯 ]
原帖由 Chi_Hang 於 2010-4-24 19:20 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
To Kaix:
From your own point of view, is MTM service better than Connex, worse than Connex or no difference?(Somehow what I feel that those videos from Youtube cannot really let see the full picture of the service provided by the train company since those news programs are for the sick of reporting troubles of the train network.)
Connex actually performed really well in the last 2 months before the end of their contract.