原帖由 rlcw 於 2010-7-28 23:39 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
I am just saying the true , the facts , affecting you , me , and Hong Kong'ers
I believes more then 80% broadmate are living at Hong Kong within this forum
Problems were here long time but no o ...
我的意思係不如你將今次件事話俾議員知,
等議員可以幫我地向政府及巴士公司施加壓力,
令佢地正視呢個問題
原帖由 kiwai 於 2010-7-29 09:01 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
我的意思係不如你將今次件事話俾議員知,
等議員可以幫我地向政府及巴士公司施加壓力,
令佢地正視呢個問題
Yeah ! Agreed with you ...
We should do something in order to resolve it .
其實路邊廢氣咁多，向車尾噴同向右噴，
分別唔係好大，如果只向右噴，
企安全島果Ｄ人，就會食得好應！
如果真係要改善巴士廢氣對路邊空氣質素ｏ既影響，
應該學北美洲咁，將死氣喉裝ｏ係offside車頂，
等Ｄ死氣隨風吹散，唔會ｏ係路面積聚
(北美offside係左邊)
不過，北美巴士死氣喉位置應該係針對公共巴士，
即係要行行停停，真係影響路邊空氣質素ｏ既巴士
所以New Flyer, NABI, Gillig Phantom, Orion等ｏ既公共巴士，
死氣喉都係安裝ｏ係左邊車尾頂部
而好少行行停停，多數行公路ｏ既旅遊巴士，
例如Prevost, MCI等，死氣喉就會裝番ｏ係車底
不過，北美版Enviro500同香港版一樣，死氣喉係裝ｏ係車底，
並冇因為佢公共巴士ｏ既身份而改裝！
原帖由 peterpan 於 2010-7-29 10:57 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
其實路邊廢氣咁多，向車尾噴同向右噴，
分別唔係好大，如果只向右噴，
企安全島果Ｄ人，就會食得好應！
如果真係要改善巴士廢氣對路邊空氣質素ｏ既影響，
應該學北美洲咁，將死氣喉裝ｏ係offside車頂，
等Ｄ死氣隨風吹散，唔會ｏ係路面積聚
(北美o ...
Umm ... At least the bus operator and the government should focus on what they "must do" since law system were enforce them "must do"
Truly , focus on right side will affecting the "企安全島果Ｄ人" , you won't standing at the 安全島 for over 5 minutes right ? But you will wait for a bus over 5 minutes in most the time
[ 本帖最後由 rlcw 於 2010-7-29 11:05 編輯 ]
題外話,... 如果 hybrid 巴士起步時用電可能會好一點.. 當然, 這個應用在巴士上可能仲有好多問題要解決
原帖由 rlcw 於 2010-7-29 11:03 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Umm ... At least the bus operator and the government should focus on what they "must do" since law system were enforce them "must do"
Truly , focus on right side will affecting the "企安全島果Ｄ人" , ...
I wait for a tram over 5 minutes in most the timewww.hkitalk.net- D, [: y2 U8 Z' t, p- j% a# d2 W( V