點解香港D新巴士死氣喉很多係左手邊 ?

原帖由 rlcw 於 2010-7-28 23:39 發表


I am just saying the true , the facts , affecting you , me , and Hong Kong'ers

I believes more then 80% broadmate are living at Hong Kong within this forum  

Problems were here long time but no o ...

我的意思係不如你將今次件事話俾議員知,
等議員可以幫我地向政府及巴士公司施加壓力,
令佢地正視呢個問題

原帖由 kiwai 於 2010-7-29 09:01 發表

我的意思係不如你將今次件事話俾議員知,
等議員可以幫我地向政府及巴士公司施加壓力,
令佢地正視呢個問題

Yeah ! Agreed with you ...

We should do something in order to resolve it .

其實路邊廢氣咁多，向車尾噴同向右噴，
分別唔係好大，如果只向右噴，
企安全島果Ｄ人，就會食得好應！

如果真係要改善巴士廢氣對路邊空氣質素ｏ既影響，
應該學北美洲咁，將死氣喉裝ｏ係offside車頂，
等Ｄ死氣隨風吹散，唔會ｏ係路面積聚
(北美offside係左邊)

不過，北美巴士死氣喉位置應該係針對公共巴士，
即係要行行停停，真係影響路邊空氣質素ｏ既巴士
所以New Flyer, NABI, Gillig Phantom, Orion等ｏ既公共巴士，
死氣喉都係安裝ｏ係左邊車尾頂部

而好少行行停停，多數行公路ｏ既旅遊巴士，
例如Prevost, MCI等，死氣喉就會裝番ｏ係車底

不過，北美版Enviro500同香港版一樣，死氣喉係裝ｏ係車底，
並冇因為佢公共巴士ｏ既身份而改裝！

原帖由 peterpan 於 2010-7-29 10:57 發表
其實路邊廢氣咁多，向車尾噴同向右噴，
分別唔係好大，如果只向右噴，
企安全島果Ｄ人，就會食得好應！

如果真係要改善巴士廢氣對路邊空氣質素ｏ既影響，
應該學北美洲咁，將死氣喉裝ｏ係offside車頂，
等Ｄ死氣隨風吹散，唔會ｏ係路面積聚
(北美o ...

Umm ... At least the bus operator and the government should focus on what they "must do" since law system were enforce them "must do"

Truly , focus on right side will affecting the "企安全島果Ｄ人" , you won't standing at the 安全島 for over 5 minutes right ? But you will wait for a bus over 5 minutes in most the time

[ 本帖最後由 rlcw 於 2010-7-29 11:05 編輯 ]

題外話,... 如果 hybrid 巴士起步時用電可能會好一點.. 當然, 這個應用在巴士上可能仲有好多問題要解決

原帖由 rlcw 於 2010-7-29 11:03 發表

Umm ... At least the bus operator and the government should focus on what they "must do" since law system were enforce them "must do"

Truly , focus on right side will affecting the "企安全島果Ｄ人" , ...

I wait for a tram over 5 minutes in most the timewww.hkitalk.net- D, [: y2 U8 Z' t, p- j% a# d2 W( V