原帖由 656-HU3984 於 2012-1-23 23:11 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
或者我應該specific d,
係架短B9姐.
不過, 批低B之前要成批咁hold起停牌,
我諗城巴都買佢怕
但又不得不承認堆雙層富豪捱得, 雖然表現就係強差人意左 "少少"
城巴咁用車法堆富豪唔分開兩截咁斷開已經算係咁 :lol ...
雙層富豪表現,係睇廠點tune
至於大買DENNIS,應該係同方便保養有關
雙層車係悶架LA,希望批後生仔,比到比金公司長富豪更厲害既表現
原帖由 petcity 於 2012-1-24 00:46 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
不如，又拎下你所謂業界資料(幫人反問定)
你咁講我會覺得有人總係以巴士公司職員口述資料當寶劍用
巴士冇油擺街犯法架，唔好要我拎證據，前輩咁講你要信:handshake ...
你所講十分認同:call:
咁附件俾D BILL LADE你過下癮, 不過唔包PACKING LIST, 因為真係人地D機密:handshake
原帖由 PKD32 於 2012-1-23 10:59 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
唔肯找數住?雖然買左＝一定要找數，唔找數就會關係唔好，但咁樣同唔造新產品，應該未必有直接關係！
Commercial contracts does not work like that. For acquisition contracts like that, it is likely that the final payment - which tends to be a significant portion of the full value - is required to be paid on delivery of the product.
Now I do not know the detail, but my speculation is the debate around what constitutes the term "delivery". I guess one party is trying to withhold payment by arguing that with the buses not being licensed into service, they would not be count as "delivered" and hence they are not liable to make the final payment, whilst the other argues that the vehicles have been taken up at the other's permises, so as far as they are concerned, they have been "delivered".
By common sense, it's probably not difficult to see what the issue is. However, in the commercial or legal world, this is far less clear cut. But the bottom line is, for HK you have one (or a pair) of operators who are very close to its key competitor, whilst the only other customer is being so cheeky. So it should not come as a surprise to see someone saying enough is enough and pull out - at least on a short term basis.
If it sounds extreme, then look no further than Mercedes, who has excellent presents in Europe as well as certain parts of Asia. Despite HK being a substantial market, if a manufacturer sees that the effort to break into it is not worthy, then they won't bother. It is business world, afterall, and it is all about making money.
原帖由 DK704_3N133 於 2012-1-22 18:03 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
條數咁計?
ATE+ATEU+ATEE+8XX+84XX+85XX+6XX+64XX=AVBE+AVBW+AVD+AVWU+7XX+4XX+AVBWU+AVWUS
E3年代, B9未出世, ATE 200幾部, 後期B9出世, B9數目有ATE 6-7成
E4年代, 只有ATEU, 下代B9直去E5
E5年代, ATEE, 比夠7 ...
冇記錯係計埋白板
原帖由 CTB1545 於 2012-1-23 14:41 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
唔係話唔比你,但係你知唔知咩叫公司機密?
的而且確富豪開出黎每架車係貴過ADL,你識人做富豪代理嘅話唔怕問下佢地
巴士迷上網交流下就成日叫人擺證據,我講出黎公司比一個月人工趕我扯呀知唔知呀 ...
Probably have to bear in mind that exchange rates come into play as well. My gathering was that when KMB ordered these B9s, price was one of the factors driven by favourable exchange rates.
And of course, we all know exchange rate fluctuates and that alone can upset the price on the table significantly... What it was years back is rather different from what it is say over the last year.
原帖由 AV512 於 2012-1-24 03:56 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
冇記錯係計埋白板
冇計白板, 只有金車
http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/thread-658991-5-1.html (#42) ~
原帖由 petcity 於 2012-1-24 00:48 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
你既諗法絕對唔要得
那怕是ISLe，只要富豪唔再出現，單調係值得
應該嘗試將單調當作情趣
按：個人對於咩車廠車冇咩太大傾向
點解"富豪"咁"萬惡不赦"呢? 我唔清楚你o既諗法有幾"要得", 我只係知道如果剩係買單一供應商, 對公司o黎風險係會增加.
不過如果富豪真係唔玩, 金色公司都唔會剩係買ADL o既車, 或者又有另一番景象
按:以上純屬個人意見
B9長定短都有一個擺到明既先天問題，都唔夠對手好太，超級巴士公司就無所謂，佢買車最重要平
唔係當年點解買珍寶部部都無風油太....都係錢既問題.....而對面海公司都多彎到嘔一堆堆，好唔好太就真係重要參考....你叫佢買B9唔買E400/500，除非平到嘔姐
唔係同自己玩自己派車一樣，人地去試scania唔試B9長牌都係因為人地行中軸.....