原帖由 ma212223 於 2012-10-13 21:20 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
九巴又唔係換3+2
2+2曲梯同直梯差唔多,但2+2曲梯座位就多啲,長途缐當然最好用2+2曲梯
流水曬命缐先用直梯,咁先係適當派車
If you are saying 2+2 3AV (especially HC-HG batch), I would would still prefer new bus over those...
AC is much better on new bus than those so-call "appropriate" bus...
Seating on the bus for at least 50 min and my butt is all sweaty wet...Happened a few times in the past summer
Bottom line, you can't speak for all passenger.
Therefore shouldn't make conclusion that which bus is the most "appropriate" for dispatch...
前面有師兄講點解唔甩番兩個廣告再上落另外兩部車度。上咗又要甩又要再貼，貼紙要另外再俾過錢，咁既然有無廣告嘅車，咪可以節省無謂的開資，亦可免卻俾人話浪費。
原帖由 dicksonboy 於 2012-10-15 15:55 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
If you are saying 2+2 3AV (especially HC-HG batch), I would would still prefer new bus over those...
AC is much better on new bus than those so-call "appropriate" bus...
Seating on the bus for at le ...
Well, it depends. Say, if those new buses are equipped with V-seat, then I would rather choose 3AV.
For AC system, sometimes the AC in new buses are even worse than those so-called old buses. I did experience it with my friend (not a bus fan) on an AVBWU before, and he asked me whether this bus is old. When I told him its a new bus, he even doubted.
By the way, you are right that no one can speak for all passengers, but Im pretty sure that for most of the normal passengers, they wouldnt take whether the buses are old or new in account that much. If new buses come but they cant get on the bus, it is just pointless to them.
原帖由 GR1473 於 2012-10-14 02:50 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
除咗3+2AV,同期連2+2AD都絕種，直至一段極短時間HB1162去過K廠之外，
到今日都冇2+2AD。相信最快要下年批車變續命車先會再晌K廠出現 睇個勢K廠3AD都好有可能絕種
原帖由 teddybus 於 2012-10-16 20:16 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Well, it depends. Say, if those new buses are equipped with V-seat, then I would rather choose 3AV.
For AC system, sometimes the AC in new buses are even worse than those so-called old buses. I did ...
Really~? The other day I rode an 3+2 AD on rt 46x,
Multiple passengers commented that the bus was old on that one trip.
What are the odds that I just heard those couple people comment that on that one single trip?
People are not stupid, and most people prefer new over old if they have a choice
This is just human nature and a simple fact.
If you don't want to admit it, that's fine, have a great time and I really careless.
Of course, if we are talking about antique, then it might be a different story.
原帖由 dicksonboy 於 2012-10-17 02:23 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Really~? The other day I rode an 3+2 AD on rt 46x,
Multiple passengers commented that the bus was old on that one trip.
What are the odds that I just heard those couple people comment that on that one single trip?'
People are not stupid, and most people prefer new over old if they have a choice
This is just human nature and a simple fact.
If you don't want to admit it, that's fine, have a great time and I really careless.
Of course, if we are talking about antique, then it might be a different story.
I heard many people from different source complaining that AC in AVBWUs are comparatively weaker than those in 3AVs or even ALs, didnt you know that?
If you make a comparison in an aspect of seat type, it is no doubt that most people would rather prefer 2+2 seat than 3+2 seats. It is not an issue of new and old, but the extend of comfort instead. Say if you got a 3+2 AVBWU, I am sure that the same thing will just happen. I remember someone had pointed out that they heard some kids saying that 2+2 AS is a new bus, so what does it imply?
Im not aimed at criticizing you, I just want to point out another aspects of the issue that you may neglect, but anyway if you know it and choose to deny it, okay fine, I wish you have a good time too.
根據年份網，兩部RJ蛋甩牌42A上36M和39A:funk:
原帖由 hka148 於 2012-10-18 11:13 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
根據年份網，兩部RJ蛋甩牌42A上36M和39A:funk: 年份網係真既話,
想爆粗:@:@:@:@:@:L:L:L:L:L:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:funk::funk::funk::funk::funk:
兩條相對黎講既爛線都掛歐5蛋?L廠無野下話?
39A係咪痴線?ATE--->ATR--->BW--->ASU--->BWU
浪費,不值得掛,ASU 當好似43M咁既原因先掛姐
BW 都算好好好盡架啦
仲要BWU?L廠係咪傻架
39A 成為第一條頹頹地既線掛歐5蛋,多得L廠創造"奇蹟"
36M BW 都夠
原帖由 GM3701 於 18-10-2012 05:06 PM 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
年份網係真既話,
想爆粗:@:@:@:@:@:L:L:L:L:L:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:funk::funk::funk::funk::funk:
兩條相對黎講既爛線都掛歐5蛋?L廠無野下話?
39A係咪痴線?ATE--->ATR--->BW--->ASU--->BWU
浪費,不值得掛,ASU 當好似43 ...
36M用3AV啦
39A而D線用膠躉得啦
病態仲嚴重過沙廠攞ATEE掛43X同269D, AVBWU掛286M
個部RJ 應該比36B 好過36M 其實36B 部份ATE 係ZF 波箱, 可以與58X 的蛋對調喎
成日比42A 食蛋