話說同區綠小 13 唔夠載，
運輸署竟然叫醫院自己開員工接送車，這是甚麼監管機構？
唔怪得九龍醫院17M爆棚，
我見有私人coaster車頭寫住醫管局專車落太子。。 其實新巴想郁796S好耐，前年RDP諗住學797M一車走天涯經富康直出，點知調景嶺班議員唔放行，到舊年RDP終於交出呢個縮短陰乾大計，成機將796C縮返去蘇屋，又可以拓展客量，一舉多得。
到時796S連清半呢個獨市位都冇埋，要cut容乜易，好快步692後塵。
至於796C，而家可以踢走西九果段蝕錢路段，另一邊延長去清半，其實同而家返將軍澳站既路程相差無幾，但就食埋清半出九龍班新客，除笨有精！ 796C, actually no one take this from/to Cheung Sha Wan/Shum Shui Po, better cut it to Prince Edward instead.
For others, 98C/296C support all the way. 796S 通告: http://www.nwstbus.com.hk/en/uploadedFiles/evs_notice/C201400292a02.pdf
796P 通告: http://www.nwstbus.com.hk/en/uploadedFiles/evs_notice/C201400293a02.pdf
796X 通告: http://www.nwstbus.com.hk/en/uploadedFiles/evs_notice/C201400295a02.pdf
[ 本帖最後由 adrianso_nwfb14 於 2014-2-1 08:41 編輯 ] 原帖由 qualcomm 於 2014-1-31 10:37 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
796C, actually no one take this from/to Cheung Sha Wan/Shum Shui Po, better cut it to Prince Edward instead.
For others, 98C/296C support all the way.
Sorry, 796C complements 296C's service as the latter takes Tai Po Road and Sham Shui Po East, which needs at least 20 minutes walk to Lai Chi Kok Road.
Cut to Prince Edward will only send passengers to MTR.
Declaration: my wife always take 796C to/from Sham Shui Po. 原帖由 eric278 於 2014-1-31 13:59 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Sorry, 796C complements 296C's service as the latter takes Tai Po Road and Sham Shui Po East, which needs at least 20 minutes walk to Lai Chi Kok Road.
Cut to Prince Edward will only send passengers...
Whether your wife takes 796C or not is not a concern of shorten the route to Prince Edward. 原帖由 qualcomm 於 2014-1-31 10:37 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
796C, actually no one take this from/to Cheung Sha Wan/Shum Shui Po, better cut it to Prince Edward instead.
For others, 98C/296C support all the way.
Like the route 971, despite there is only a few passengers travel along the route from Olympic to Hoi Lai Estate.
It is not wise to employ another NWFB regulator to serve at, say, the Olympic Bus Terminal.
This is the same case...
Even there is a suitable Terminal at Prince Edward, NWFB prefer their route 796C to stick with the So Uk Terminal with the route 970 and 970X for easier mongering purpose.
回復 63# 的帖子
On the other hand, 296C and 98C don't reach Tiu Keng Leng and TKO South, people there need 796Cand it is also a complement of 796X from Kowloon City to TKO during peak hours
and 796C is faster than 296C from Mong Kok to Sheung Tak
回復 68# 的帖子
shorten 796C to Prince Edward should make it more frequent at Mong Kok and Kowloon City 原帖由 ma212223 於 2014-1-31 17:30 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gifshorten 796C to Prince Edward should make it more frequent at Mong Kok and Kowloon City
So...any suggestion of a great terminal for the route 796C at Prince Edward with existing NWFB regulator?
Unless, u are suggesting Prince Edward is a circulating point of the route 796C...