From the perspective of limited resources, replacing the route 296C by 796C would be a suitable decision. Notice that Bus fee is only guarantee a space to get on a bus but not for a seat, so there's no excuse to take no seats available on a bus as a reason of declining the cancellation of the route 296C.
However, the route 296C and 796C are actually doing different jobs. The route 296C is actually doing something much far away from serving the Kowloon West to Sheung Tak Estate. For example, to assist the route 296A, and responsible for a huge amount of short-distance passengers along the route, etc.
Consequently, it is suggested to do further research for the possibility of replaceing the route 296C.
原帖由 kuro 於 2014-2-1 00:16 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
都話296C係尚德已經夠客，296C有九龍灣客同太子客，而調景嶺客己經有796C，而98A,98C原先設計問題搞到好兜路，而296A確實需要輔助線清客，你確定坑口冇客？ ...
1. 296C我從來未見過頂閘，九龍內陸流水都只係執雞
2. 296A係俾人特快去觀塘轉車，你整條行山的296M+93M，點幫296A清客？
仲想異想天開做埋98A山上轉乘果份，效率仲差過而家98A，山上真係多謝晒
3. 坑口有冇客係一件事，係咪要用98C做跨區又係第二件事囉
原帖由 kuro 於 2014-2-1 00:16 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
都話296C係尚德已經夠客，296C有九龍灣客同太子客，而調景嶺客己經有796C，而98A,98C原先設計問題搞到好兜路，而296A確實需要輔助線清客，你確定坑口冇客？ ... 296C 繁忙時段載客量得六成，仲保得住 15 分鐘一班都已經要偷笑。
原帖由 adrianso_nwfb14 於 2014-1-31 12:05 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
796S 通告: http://www.nwstbus.com.hk/en/uploadedFiles/evs_notice/C201400292a02.pdf
796P 通告: http://www.nwstbus.com.hk/en/uploadedFiles/evs_notice/C201400293a02.pdf
796X 通告: http://www.nwstbus.co ...
張796s通告叫受影響乘客坐796c轉796s, 斷估唔會叫人比$7.9去調景嶺轉車吧:Q
好應該增設一個雙向分段去調景嶺再轉796S, 兩程合計$4.6
而家796S縮去將軍澳站跟手仲CUT到30分鐘一班, 倒不如照係清半開, 停寶盈花園站後直去調景嶺站, 反正將軍澳站同將軍澳天主教小學都無乜人坐:(
原帖由 S3BL100 於 2014-2-1 00:32 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
1. 296C我從來未見過頂閘，九龍內陸流水都只係執雞
2. 296A係俾人特快去觀塘轉車，你整條行山的296M+93M，點幫296A清客？
仲想異想天開做埋98A山上轉乘果份，效率仲差過而家98A，山上真係多謝晒
3. 坑口有冇客係一件事，係咪要 ...
淨係今年都試過3, 4次做296C閘長哦,
原帖由 fleetline 於 2014-2-1 12:47 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
淨係今年都試過3, 4次做296C閘長哦,
你上錯左269C?;P
原帖由 kuro 於 2014-1-31 23:04 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
都話296C係唔會搬，尚德三線唔好諗啦
諗下296m點同93m合拼幫296A做聯合班次仲好啦
甘98A,98C改行將隧有望
點解你硬係咁鐘意將296M同其他線合併再兜遠D?
無論你個建議想將296M拉去邊或者同其他線合併都好
你所謂既救線既合併建議只會令車資增加兼趕客
大哥, 唔係合併或者拉長就一定救到線o架
原帖由 kuro 於 2014-2-1 00:16 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
都話296C係尚德已經夠客，296C有九龍灣客同太子客，而調景嶺客己經有796C，而98A,98C原先設計問題搞到好兜路，而296A確實需要輔助線清客，你確定坑口冇客？
乘客有條直接快既路線唔搭走去搭輔助流水線
係咪同時間作對?
我同你講, 296A根本無需要任何路線輔助
因為296A夠晒直接同快
仲有你有咩數據話296A需要輔助線清客?
條296A已經夠晒直接
原帖由 Gary_B 於 2014-2-1 14:57 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
你上錯左269C?;P
296C是會頂閘的，我試過企將隧口觀察客量
296C下繁有不少班次可以企很多人/頂閘
不過條線客量一直在跌，被796C搶走了不少客，隨著九巴越加越貴，296C不再頂閘之日近了