dennis28a
發表於 2006-5-15 03:11
原帖由 500 於 2006-5-15 02:27 發表
言則連小小預案都唔準備定?
(每樣做多一小步,夾埋就唔止慳到一part時間)
有...按原本規劃...去到 2008-2011 年先有需要加車。
根本上係地鐵無聊,明知 2005 年迪士尼線通車,係 2004 年先去買車。
(迪士尼係 2001 年動工,其實地鐵係 2004 年東涌吊車動工先走去買車)
winningmok
發表於 2006-5-15 21:40
睇隔離版第2架tcl k-train到左香港囉啵!
Ken_Dy
發表於 2006-5-16 05:37
原帖由 dennis28a 於 2006-5-15 03:11 發表
有...按原本規劃...去到 2008-2011 年先有需要加車。
根本上係地鐵無聊,明知 2005 年迪士尼線通車,係 2004 年先去買車。
(迪士尼係 2001 年動工,其實地鐵係 2004 年東涌吊車動工先走去買車)
2004 年先去買車!?! Absolutely not!Sigh~
Hello mate,
don't you know that MTRC was moderising those 3 trains sets from current M-trains since 2003 (AC281,289,284,291,BC490)??? lol
TS1 consists of PQ501 (AC291) - QP502 (CA284)
TS2 consists of PQ503 (AC289) - QP504 (CA274)
TS3 consists of PQ505 (AC281) - QP506 (CB490)
Check that out from MTRC website or other relevant resources from Internet, cheers!
[ 本帖最後由 Ken_Dy 於 2006-5-16 05:41 編輯 ]
mmlcs36
發表於 2006-5-16 07:16
Ken_Dy
發表於 2006-5-16 22:18
原帖由 mmlcs36 於 2006-5-16 07:16 發表
他是表示,東涌線為何不在一開始興建迪士尼線時,便去訂新車
而要2004 年先去急買車
而不是指m車在何時被抽去迪線
Excuse me, according to this message "明知 2005 年迪士尼線通車,係 2004 年先去買車。"
It is relating to TCL new K-train!?! No joke please!
500
發表於 2006-5-16 22:39
原帖由 Ken_Dy 於 2006-5-16 22:18 發表
Excuse me, according to this message "明知 2005 年迪士尼線通車,係 2004 年先去買車。"
It is relating to TCL new K-train!?! No joke please!
Yes, it is.
And be reminded that:
1)This thread weren't mean for April fools.
2)We are talking about TCL new K-train right from the start of this thread.
Failure to understand the main points above should re-read the whole thread from start.
Everyone who frquently reading here should understands buying trains has to take some 1-2 years at least,
that includes tendering, finanical analysis, arragement, deliveries and such in this busniess oriented world.
[ 本帖最後由 500 於 2006-5-16 22:57 編輯 ]
3ad150
發表於 2006-5-16 22:55
原帖由 winningmok 於 2006-5-15 21:40 發表
睇隔離版第2架tcl k-train到左香港囉啵!
13號到港及在14號早上於小壕灣車廠卸下.
Ken_Dy
發表於 2006-5-16 23:09
原帖由 500 於 2006-5-16 22:39 發表
Yes, it is.
And be reminded that:
1)This thread weren't mean for April fools.
2)We are talking about TCL new K-train right from the start of this thread.
Failure to understand the main...
Hi sir, thanks for your high quality points of view,
did you get confuse in Traditional Chinese and English?
The main point in that reply post (from broadmate id=dennis28a) was just concern about those 3 DRL trains sets,
rather than talking about 4 new sets of TCL trains...
"DRL opens in 2004, MTRC planned to purchase train sets in 2003!?!"
To be honest, you are wlecome to refer to that particular reply post whenever you wish to,
would you please kindly check that out before making a reply,
however, it is really great that to hear and read loads of business terms... =.="
sigh again~
[ 本帖最後由 Ken_Dy 於 2006-5-16 23:21 編輯 ]
500
發表於 2006-5-16 23:20
原帖由 Ken_Dy 於 2006-5-16 23:09 發表
But the main point in that reply post (from broadmate id=dennis28a) was just concern about those 3 DRL trains sets,
rather than 4 new sets of TCL trains...
would you please kindly check that...
Not at all. The discussion between me and Dennis is why MTR had to buy those K-train in such a rush manner,
and thus using the original width/spec of K-train on URL and the aftermath of reinstallations of the platfrom edge rubber on TCL stations.
So, if you insists we are talking on those Mod-trains on DRL, you're just making yourself an idiot. Period.
Ken_Dy
發表於 2006-5-16 23:30
原帖由 500 於 2006-5-16 23:20 發表
Not at all. The discussion between me and Dennis is why MTR had to buy those K-train in such a rush manner,
and thus using the original width/spec of K-train on URL and the aftermath of reinstallations of the platfrom edge rubber on TCL stations.
So, if you insists we are talking on those Mod-trains on DRL, you're just making yourself an idiot. Period.
Wow...Just among Mr. 500 and broadmate Dennis?
Okay, that's fine then, I got used to know what means by a "Discussion forum",
it is used for only 2 persons to discuss one particular topic or the priority of using the forum, right mate?
Yes, I knew the topic of course, which you guys were talking about,
yet, sorry for wasted Mr. 500's valuable time to transfer into English version for us...
P.S.: Please be aware of using some particular English word in the reply, which is totally reflect the manner of your post.
[ 本帖最後由 Ken_Dy 於 2006-5-16 23:44 編輯 ]