[路線計劃/RPP]
2018-2019年度葵青區巴士路線計劃
[複製鏈接]
|
但係 948系 呢幾年一路都加緊班
只要下次重有得加班或者廷長服務時間既話,今次其實都收貨
|
|
|
|
|
頭站改放長安,只可以話理解到兩巴既諗法
喺資源不足下,唯有放棄長安保長亨
假如資源足夠,其實應該帝化長安
一係拉 930A 入嚟;一係自己一條做晒,青機加長安直出西隧
|
|
|
|
|
今日收了貨, 青北客即時走人, 到時全日對青北有何意義?
|
|
|
|
|
其實說到底都是總站問題, 並非資源不足 (君不見九巴仲可以拆多條X42P出嚟).....
因為長亨長宏都無位, 先搞到長安成為磨心.....
講真用長康巴總做總站再上長宏原線, 或者948和242X調總站是否不可行?
|
|
|
|
|
I thinkFrom Tsing Yi
0640-0810/0820 948A0735-0805 948B/948X/948P (Mon-Fri ONLY)
0810/0820-1700 948
From Causeway Bay
1500-2400 948
Except Cheung Wang / Cheung Hang before 0735 don't have any 948_ service, there have already covered nearly all space in Tsing Yi and fulfill much need in the new plan, maybe additional departures are needed with the same timeslot is already good enough.
Cheung Wang, actually 948 can share the terminal with 43A and 248M, no need to let Cheung On to via like that.
I suggest 948 keep the Sat/Sun/Holiday route for daily, and 948A in Cheung Wang on or before 0735.
|
|
|
|
|
咁你就要搞清楚,點解要開241X同服務對象係邊個啦。
|
|
支持遷拆尖碼及灣碼巴總
|
|
|
本帖最後由 tonytse126 於 2018-1-16 18:59 編輯
近日長安羅議員於區內出哂banner和poster,表示強烈反對44M搬去青衣站,但對948就隻字不提,難道唔做總站就好重要,而948兜到天荒地老淪為長安雞肋就唔緊要? |
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|