AP69意外三周年

Well, if Criminal case cannot be done, is it possible to do a civil case, this is quite common in US, I remember about 7-8 years back, a King County Metro bus falled off Alaskan way bridge to the ground due to an attacked from a passenger, and the driver and the attacker died, since they cannot press charges to the attackers, the passengers end up sueing the family of the attacker, and end up settle for couple million us dollars.  

If they cannot sue the driver, then sue the driver's company for the money lor, I think civil case is alot easier to do then criminal case.

原帖由 LN9267 於 2006-7-3 23:06 發表


我都明,法律只可以做到盡量公正。

e d正正就是法律空隙了。

btw, i think HK counted casualty differently then US/ CAN, cause even if you are only convicted of endanger driving, but if it caused 21th death, then the penalty (counts) will multiply for 21 times....which if the sentence is either 6 months in jail or 20,000USD, then x 21times, he will have enought to regret.

原帖由 914 於 2006-7-4 02:49 發表


如果法律是公正的，他理應被判終身監禁！

[ 本帖最後由 art0925 於 2006-7-11 18:07 編輯 ]

原帖由 art0925 於 2006-7-10 16:28 發表
Well, if Criminal case cannot be done, is it possible to do a civil case, this is quite common in US, I remember about 7-8 years back, a King County Metro bus falled off Alaskan way bridge to the ground due to an attacked from a passenger, and the driver and the attacker died, since they cannot press charges to the attackers, the passengers end up sueing the family of the attacker, and end up settle for couple million us dollars.  

If they cannot sue the driver, then sue the driver's company for the money lor, I think civil case is alot easier to do then criminal case.

Can you say chinese?

Thx.

原帖由 kmb~mcw1 於 2006-7-3 22:31 發表
當時有21人死的車禍

相比起當年蘭桂芳人踩人,石峽尾匯豐大火和
卡拉ok大火和嘉利大廈的死亡人數還要多

蘭桂芳事件是在大時大節事期發生
所以死亡人數多些
不過不及AP69車禍的死亡人數

若是這樣
我要 ...

嘉利大廈事件好似39-40人死亡!

Sorry, I've lived in US for 15 years, and in return to HK for 6 months now, I don't know how to type in Chinese. thx.

原帖由 LN9267 於 2006-7-10 18:34 發表


Can you say chinese?

Thx.

原帖由 LN9267 於 2006-7-10 18:34 發表

Can you say chinese?

Thx.

有邊d字唔明需要翻譯？

其實有一點我一直都未見過有確實報導既：
究竟架巴士long在公路旁幾耐先跌呢？
只想知司機同乘客承受左幾耐既"極度恐懼"......

那朝開電視，我都睇到呆左。

[ 本帖最後由 pochi 於 2006-7-11 11:57 編輯 ]

原帖由 pochi 於 2006-7-11 11:47 發表
其實有一點我一直都未見過有確實報導既：
究竟架巴士long在公路旁幾耐先跌呢？
只想知司機同乘客承受左幾耐既"極度恐懼"......

那朝開電視，我都睇到呆左。

有人話係90秒左右...
但已經無從稽考

原帖由 kingprowm 於 2006-7-10 19:05 發表

嘉利大廈事件好似39-40人死亡!

係四十人死亡

原帖由 pochi 於 2006-7-11 11:47 發表

那朝開電視，我都睇到呆左。

我果陣睇到電視都唔敢相信有呢單野...
見到未見過有咁大架巴士跌左落山

[ 本帖最後由 大聲公 於 2006-7-11 12:48 編輯 ]

原帖由 LN9267 於 2006-7-10 18:34 發表


Can you say chinese?

Thx.

Well, if Criminal case cannot be done, is it possible to do a civil case, this is quite common in US, I remember about 7-8 years back, a King County
嗯，如果不能進行刑事訴訟，唔知可唔可以打民事訟訟？o係美國 le o的事十分常見。我記得約 7-8 年前，一架 King County Metro
Metro bus falled off Alaskan way bridge to the ground due to an attacked from a passenger, and the driver and the attacker died, since they
巴士因為有乘客襲擊司機，所以從阿拉斯加o既一條橋上跌落地面。最後司機及襲擊者都死o左。由於佢o地
cannot press charges to the attackers, the passengers end up sueing the family of the attacker, and end up settle for couple million us dollars.  
唔可以   (?)   落案控告個襲擊者，o的乘客最後放棄控告襲擊o者o既家庭，並以數百萬美金作為和解。

If they cannot sue the driver, then sue the driver's company for the money lor, I think civil case is alot easier to do then criminal case
如果佢o地告唔倒個司機，咁咪入稟告個司機所屬o既公司去獲得賠償囉。我諗民事案易打過刑事案好多。