[太陽報新聞]西港島線無上蓋發展

原帖由 Cantona 於 2006-9-1 23:27 發表

個人估計︰新城會開辦來往堅尼地城、西環到筲箕灣、柴灣的特快線
行車時間大有可能比地鐵更快

中環灣仔繞道開通先有機會有堅尼地城、西環到筲箕灣、柴灣的特快線

原帖由 Cantona 於 2006-9-1 23:27 發表
個人估計︰新城會開辦來往堅尼地城、西環到筲箕灣、柴灣的特快線
行車時間大有可能比地鐵更快

就算係咁
我對港島線ge客量都絕不擔心
因為新城響港島北一方面將重點放響同地鐵鬥快ge特快線
另一方面就逐漸放棄流水線又或者將之變成特快線
而特快線唔經ge地方
D客就自然送晒俾地鐵
睇下英皇道D新記站牌上面ge路線整下又少一條
整下又少一條就知
出入英皇道同埋軒尼詩道基本上除左地鐵之外都無其他好選擇

原帖由 hksubways 於 2006-9-2 00:53 發表
"MTRC is an independent listed company. MTRC's request for land will violate the principle of land sales in the city. It will be unfair to other developers. It also raises questions about collusion between government and business," said Chan, who added there was no base to calculate the price of the land.

但政府係地鐵的大股東 wor~

原帖由 hksubways 於 2006-9-2 00:53 發表
If the MTR is so intent on building the line, then it should use its own funds since its fairer to the bus operators and land developers. The goverment should not budge nor yield to MTR since its already too greedy as evidenced by its request for funds for SCL when KCR offered to internally finance the whole project. At entrance gates you can see the sign "MTR is a passenger railway", now isn't this an outright contradiction? Why shouldn't it read "MTR is a property developer who also provides railway services to residents in HK"? This is what privatization of a major public interest like MTR produces, a money obsessed monster that puts money first and passengers' welfare second.

After this lesson, MTR would be more careful in considering public sentiment when constructing the WIL and SIL and avoid tacky stuff like the destined for failure Kennedy Town station development.

So, bus operators should pay for the road construction and maintenance cost,
shouldn't they??

Railway must be a deficit project
Where does the money come from if there is no subsidization from government??
Or u think railways should disappear in the world??

原帖由 hk_ayu 於 2006-9-2 07:54 發表



So, bus operators should pay for the road construction and maintenance cost,
shouldn't they??

Railway must be a deficit project
Where does the money come from if there is no subsidizatio ...

咁都ok 呀..政府其實無必要俾真銀注資lor...

個塊地皮未當係政府注資俾地鐵當補貼.....另外一半要靠地鐵自己搞掂la..

如果係咁做..就好合理lor

問題係..塊地皮係政府地.....如果咁樣俾地鐵法..
送埋地俾地鐵...同時..政府又俾三十幾億俾地鐵..
呢個就覺得政府全資興建支線有咩分別......

原帖由 benchan120 於 2006-9-2 09:49 發表
呢個就覺得政府全資興建支線有咩分別......

冇所謂
橫掂政府係大股東

再者地鐵可以有更多資金去狙擊巴士同私家車

原帖由 benchan120 於 2006-9-2 09:49 發表


咁都ok 呀..政府其實無必要俾真銀注資lor...

個塊地皮未當係政府注資俾地鐵當補貼.....另外一半要靠地鐵自己搞掂la..

如果係咁做..就好合理lor

問題係..塊地皮係政府地.....如果咁樣俾地鐵法..
送埋 ...

hksubway兄話政府唔應該用任何形式補貼

原帖由 hksubways 於 2006-9-2 12:45 發表


Through bonds and repaying them by profits from passenger carriage... just like KCR

KCR has profits mainly from passenger carriage.
The reason behind is that KCR charge premium fare for Lo Wu boundary-crossing service


So, without subsidization from government,
MTR may charge premium fare for all the local rapid transit service.

This is not the outcome that everyone want to see except bus fans