240(P) 荃灣(愉景新城)<->麗港城

為方便荃灣，石圍角，東北葵涌的乘客往返東九龍，特此建議開設240(P)，隨乘客的需求
而逐步轉為全日服務。

服務時間
荃灣(愉景新城)開：07:15-08:45(班次：15分鐘)
17:00-19:00(班次：20分鐘)

麗港城開：07:20-08:40(班次：20分鐘)
17:30-19:45(班次：15分鐘)

途經街道
荃灣(愉景新城)開：美環街，西樓角樓，蕙荃路，石圍角路，二陂圳路，三棟屋路，和宜
合交匯處，和宜合道，(選擇1：梨木道，大白田街)
(選擇2：大隴街，石籬總站，大隴街，圍[乙田]街)，石排街，
青山公路，呈祥道，龍翔道，蒲崗村道，彩虹道，彩虹村通道，太子道東，觀塘道，開源
道，偉業街，茶果嶺道，有康街。

麗港城開：有康街，茶果嶺道，偉業街，觀塘碼頭總站，偉業街，敬業街，成業街，茶果
嶺道，鯉魚門道，隧道，觀塘道，龍翔道，支路，彩虹道(停前彩虹臨時總站)，彩虹道，
龍翔道，呈祥道，青山公路，和宜合道，(選擇1：大隴街，石籬總站，
大隴街，圍[乙田]街，石排街，大白田街，梨木道，和宜合道)
(選擇2：直行和宜和道)，三棟屋路，二陂圳路，石圍角路，蕙荃路，
廟崗街，城門道，青山公路，西樓角路，美環街。

全程收費：$6.9
分段收費：畢架山花園往麗港城 $5.2
過蝴蝶谷交匯處後往荃灣(愉景新城) $4.6

選擇1服務石蔭、安蔭，但行車時間較久
選擇2服務和宜合道沿線，但服務不到東北葵涌屋村沿線

歡迎提供意見

[ 本帖最後由 pcckw 於 2006-9-27 22:41 編輯 ]

42c荃灣分段去藍田都收$7.2喎
呢條線收$6.9會唔會平左d 呢？

原帖由 Ketsu 於 2006-9-28 09:17 發表
42c荃灣分段去藍田都收$7.2喎
呢條線收$6.9會唔會平左d 呢？

42C收$7.2會否係因為未全冷，全冷後應會減價，不過小弟就唔清楚會否減到$6.9啦！

A few points:
1. I don't think there is space left at Discovery Park
Could we think about Allway Garden at Tsuen King Circuit instead?

2. I don't think it's possible to do a $6.9 fare at all.
$7.2 is not that expensive in my opinion.

3. I think route/option 1, particularly when it comes to heading to East Kowloon,
is more preferrable than route/option 2.
En route via Wai Kak Street is very time-consuming, though it might be slightly more attractive to some.

4. As for the terminus at East Kowloon, Laguna City is not so good as a choice.
Why not think about Tseung Kwan O if we are considering a new route to Tsuen Wan or Kwai Chung?

原帖由 307 於 2006-9-28 12:51 發表
A few points:
1. I don't think there is space left at Discovery Park
Could we think about Allway Garden at Tsuen King Circuit instead?

2. I don't think it's possible to do a $6.9 fare at all.
...

1. Allway Garden is full....
Nina Tower can be one of the options..........

原帖由 Ketsu 於 2006-9-28 09:17 發表
42c荃灣分段去藍田都收$7.2喎
呢條線收$6.9會唔會平左d 呢？

RDP提過,40全冷價為$6.9.
因此樓主釐訂240P同價,並無問題.

原帖由 asv2 於 2006-9-28 17:31 發表

1. Allway Garden is full....
Nina Tower can be one of the options..........

有荃灣區議員想 Cut 左條 30
之後張個位開條新線去東九

原帖由 307 於 2006-9-28 12:51 發表
3. I think route/option 1, particularly when it comes to heading to East Kowloon,
is more preferrable than route/option 2.
En route via Wai Kak Street is very time-consuming, though it might be slightly more attractive to some.

4. As for the terminus at East Kowloon, Laguna City is not so good as a choice.
Why not think about Tseung Kwan O if we are considering a new route to Tsuen Wan or Kwai Chung?

3.謝謝你提出意見，但個人覺得行圍[乙田]街是方便石籬(一)村的居民乘搭本線往東九龍，
而且石英徑站已有38,42C。

4.本線主打屋苑/村線往返東九龍，總站在將軍澳只會把收費提高，影響沿線居民的吸引
力。